Monday, 3 August 2026

A TRIP TO ROME (SUNDAY 28TH JUNE to WEDNESDAY 1ST JULY 2026)



Trajan's s Column and market near the Colosseum.


ARRIVING IN ROME

Marilyn booked a flight and hotel for the two of us to Rome. it was a birthday present. We haven’t been away for a holiday in a couple of years. My operation was three years ago and frankly it has taken me some time to get over it and recover. But also it has taken time for my confidence to travel to come back. Marilyn booked the trip before the heat waves hit us and if London has been hot, low to mid thirty degrees, Rome has been hotter. The temperature in Rome hovered just below forty degrees while we were there. Our hotel was of course air-conditioned which created a pleasant environment but once we walked out of the hotel it was like walking into an oven. We got used to it and adapted, such as walking on the shady side of a street, wearing sunglasses and hats to shade our faces. Marilyn used an umbrella too. Not the usual purpose of an umbrella for a British person but it worked. We carried water bottles and remained hydrated. Rome has water fountains and running water taps to fill up bottles everywhere. We survived the hot temperatures  well. Rome has wooded parks and many ,”vias,” have trees lining them and piazzas usually have tall buildings surrounding them which provide shade. 


When we arrived at  Rome’s Fiumicino airport  we got a bus into  the centre of the city to be dropped off at Rome’s railway termini. Our hotel was a short walking distance from the railway station. Everywhere in Rome has examples of archaeological sites. The railway station has massive stone walls just outside in the forecourt and these remains continue into the railway station complex. This was the site of the baths of Diocletian. They were the largest of Romes public baths. I always remember my Junior school history learning about the Roman baths in Bath  in Somerset; the tepidarium, the frigidarium and the caldarium. I recall illustrations showing slaves massaging those who used the baths and scraping oil over their bare skin with strigils, a knife shaped tool designed for scraping the skin. 


Our local area.

THE LOCAL AREA

To illustrate how once in Rome you are not far from an ancient ruin, in fact there are ruins buried beneath your feet ,if you only knew, wherever you go. The nearest metro station to our hotel, was Manzoni, two stops from Rome’s main railway termini. Underground, Manzoni, has its own museum display of archaeological artefacts found on the site when the station was being built. A large information sign, with detailed archaeological diagrams and photographs, mostly in Italian but with a small section translated into English. The English translation reads:

                                   
Part of the display cabinet in the Manzoni metro station.


“The first human testimony is a paved road dated to the middle Republican period 2nd century BC.

In the second half of the Ist century AD a second building was superimposed on the previous one. It was built using opus mixtum ( bricks with pyramidal tufa blocks) with marble facing on  the north side.The building may have been part of a huge imperial property called Horti Lemiani.

Finally a third wall in opus vittatum (bricks and rectangular tufa blocks) was built in Late antiquity (3rd-4th centuries Ad), which may be linked to the properties of the aristocratic family of the Roscii Aeliani.”


The display cases on the walls of this underground  station show mosaic pieces, pots, pieces of illustrated wall plaques, iron nails, marble wall facings, pieces of Samian ware pottery and a piece of a statue, the nicely rounded buttocks of a once complete statue. Within a short walk of our hotel, The Hotel Best, which is a four star  hotel on the Via di Porta Maggiore with car showrooms and a lady living on the street in one of the car showroom entrances, there was the Porto Maggiore, a magnificent 3rd century gate set within the  remains of Romes ancient Aurelian Walls. On our first evening after exploring central Rome, the Colosseum was only a ten minute walk from our hotel, we decided to explore this gateway and the area around it. We discovered near the gate the entrance to an underground tunnel. At the time we gave it no thought but later when reading about the area we were staying in we learned the importance of this tunnel entrance Firstly it is not the entrance to a tunnel but the entrance to an underground temple. We found that this temple ,not generally open to the public, was the template for the design of the  first Christian Churches. It was built in a cruciform design. The fact that it was outside the city walls and hidden underground shows that it was a secret place of worship away from the authorities gaze. 

We had hardly started on the famous sites but already we were immersed into ancient Rome, without, it seems, much effort.


A thing I do when I am in the presence of ancient buildings and ruins that tell stories from  hundreds and even thousands of years ago is touch them. I sense a connection with the past and the millennia that this building has stood. The people , events and history that has happened , in , around and because of a building, by touching the stones, makes me feel connected. Marilyn, my wife, thinks this a strange tradition but I really do feel a connection. I did this when we arrived in Rome at the Porto di Maggiore. 


Porto di Maggiore, an entrance in the Aurelian walls built in about 270 AD. Near our hotel.


THE TEMPIO DI MINERVA and Edward Austen Knight.

Another unexpected discovery in the area we were staying was  the Tempio di Minerva Medica. It was an ancient Roman nymphaeum, dedicated to Minerva and also the nymphs of spring. It probably had a spring of water coming up into it.  I have visited Chawton in Hampshire many times as an avid Jane Austen fan. I have visited and toured the Great House at Chawton where Edward Austen Knight, Jane Austen s brother, lived and inherited the Knight family fortune. The Knight family, as soon as they adopted Edward, sent him on a Grand Tour of Europe from 1790 to 1793. Something many young men from wealthy gentry and aristocratic families embarked on so that they could be imbued with the knowledge about ancient Greek and Roman culture, philosophy, sciences and languages and the great art displayed around Europe. It was an education for them that connected them with other wealthy families of influence and power around Europe and set young men up to be in government , trade and diplomacy. Therevwas of course the other side to. these rand tours. Having fun. Eating , drinking and often womanising was part of the trip if not for some, the main part. Whether Edward Austen Knight participated in this side of his tour is unknown. Some of his journals covering other parts of Europe exist. He often wrote about the politics and the economy of the city and country he visited. His Rome journals are missing. It would be very interesting to find out what he made of Rome.There is a painting of Edward at Chawton house which was painted either while he was on the Grand Tour or soon after he came back from it. It shows him with symbols of the classical world. A carved marble frieze is to his left. To the bottom right and in the background is the Tempio di Minerva Medica in Rome. 


The Temple di Minerva around the corner from our hotel. 

When we first saw the temple to Minerva it was located round the corner from our hotel down a side street. It is surrounded by apartment blocks in old buildings and is backed by the railway lines coming out of Rome’s Termini Station. It looks like a pile of bricks with a few arches and window openings. It does not look at all inviting. A poor brick crumbling ruin. It was this temple that Edward Austen found most intriguing.


The portrait of Edward Austen Knight (1768-1852) The temple of Minerva is in the bottom right. 


ON THE STREETS OF ROME

On our way into the centre of Rome on our first day we passed a small supermarket near our hotel. All along one side of the building  homeless people camped out on the pavement. One gentleman knelt facing towards Mecca and was praying. Two others sat next to each other holding beer cans. As we walked past I noticed they leant towards each other and touched their cans in friendship. The human spirit was still alive within these destitute unfortunate people. How did they get to that state? It is easy to imagine all sorts of circumstances that brought them to this. We saw a lot of destitute people living on the streets while we were in Rome. I wonder how the Rome authorities deal with them? On the forecourt of the Termini Station  while we sat in a café having a coffee one time a security guard blocked the entrance of a woman who was obviously living on the streets. However a customer had bought her a drink and bun and she was refusing to move until she received her gift. The security guard  dealt with her kindly but firmly and although he insisted on her leaving the shop he did it in a gentle manner after allowing the kind person who had bought the drink and bun to give them to her.


We walked a lot. On our first day, once we had booked into our hotel, we walked to The Circus Maximus near the Colosseum at the foot of the Palatine Hill. Ever since I was a school boy this site of chariot racing has ignited my imagination. Our history books were full of artists imaginary illustrations of chariot racing, gladiators fighting and the Roman Baths.


The site of The Circus Maximus (developed from the 1st century BC) near the Palatine Hill. At its height , 250,000 spectators could fill this stadium. The largest stadium the world has ever known.

Not far from our hotel,. a little to the north ,we walked through a small, but beautiful park called  Giardino Nicola Calipari.It has palm trees, magnolias, a number of fountains and a rose garden. In the north east corner are the ruins of the Villa Palombara which was owned by the Marquis Odo Savelli in the 17th century. There were people enjoying the park sitting at benches or strolling along. Suddenly a black clad youth on an electric bike swept through the park. Two men, standing a short disance from us started yelling and chasing the youth after he had passed them. He had stolen the phone belonging to one of them. They failed to catch him and he seemed to getaway. We felt shocked  not expecting this. Mariyn wanted to report the theft and find out if the man was OK. In the end we had to leave it. We were just visitors. The men would know how to deal with this.


Giardino Nicola Calipari.

We walked on to the magnificent Basilica Papale di Santa Maria Maggiore. A large church almost the proportions and size of a cathedral with its own dome like St Peters. Inside its walls were covered in different coloured marbles. Its ceiling richly decorated. Even the high altar had a covering, a baldachin, almost identical to the one in St Peters, made of bronze with its twisting columns. Everything was on a smaller scale than St Peters of course but in its way just as awe inspiring.


THE COLOSSEUM


On the next day, Marilyn had got us passes to visit the Colosseum, the Forum and the Palatine Hill.

We arrived fifteen minutes early. The ticketing site asked us to arrive early. The Colosseum is  popular,  tens of thousands visit it every day. Some tickets,  like ours, give us entry to two of the main tiers, and provide a website commentary and text information access through our phones. This is what we preferred to do. Other options are to join a guided tour group. There were many of these walking around. The guide wearing ear pieces and head held microphones, their groups, hered like cattle,  wearing ear pieces listening  to the guides commentary. Once we got through the entrance and had the QR codes on our phones scanned there were other check points where security checked bags and checked our online tickets again. This seemed to slow the process of us getting into the Colosseum, probably a well thought out strategy to control the number of people entering. They paced the entry of people by time slots and a slow entry process.


Inside The Colosseum (Construction began under Vesapsian between 69-79 AD)


The Colosseum is one of those world heritage places that you know what it looks like and probably know a little about  its history already. Could actually visiting a place so famous, so photographed, so  filmed and the subject of numerous documentaries be that inspiring when you actually visit it? Yes, most certainly. The Colosseum takes your breath away with its magnificence. The arena area is small compared to a modern football or rugby stadium but its capacity was 75 thousand or more spectators, comparable with the biggest modern sports stadiums and because the actual arena area is small  the tiered spectators stands look immense. You can see the uncovered area of rooms under the  arenas surface. These were the  rooms where wild animals and human gladiators were kept before they emerged into the arena through lift systems and trap doors in the floor of the Colosseum. It is said that naval sea battles were reenacted here too. But many archaeologists think that this could not have happed because of the underground room structure. It may have been possible at an earlier date of the Colosseums history before the underground rooms were added. Much is conjecture and supposition. At one end of the Colosseum is a tunnel leading out of the arena across the road to the nearby site of the Ludus Maximus. We sat one evening in a restaurant next to the ruins of the Ludus Maximus. This was the premier gladiator school in Ancient Rome. The Gladiators would walk through the tunnel into the underground complex of the Colosseum. It is said the Emperors entered the Colosseum this way too to sit in their seats at that end of the arena. 

Some gladiators were slaves, prisoners of the many wars against tribes when the Romans were expanding their Empire. Some were condemned criminals but some were free men who chose to fight for moeny and fame. The population of Rome during the late republic and eraly empire was as much as a third of the one million population, about 300, 000. It is difficult for us to conceptualise slavery in Roman terms. Many slaves were talented in mosauic design and construction. They were the builders and cooks, the servants and the scribes and administrators. the accountansand the teachers. They were integral to Roman society but they were property, they were owned. Some slaves probably had good lives and some became freemen. Others had horrendous existences. The concept of slavery is morally wrong and we real back in horror at the thought. Modern slavery exists unbelievably.But what did Roman slaves think about it?We will never know.

GUIDES

Watching tour guides working in the heat and with groups of thirty or more, looked exhausting. The heat, the crowds and trying to concentrate and show interest by those taking these tours looked like hard work. I watched one group go past. They were tired, hot and the expressions on their faces were glazed over. It looked like an ordeal. I have lead tours. I much preferred small family groups, taking them out of London to visit places such as Stonehenge. I remember taking a tour in London that even with a small group was stressful. Marilyn and I made the right decision not to go with one of the organised tour groups.


I think you have to work out how to see Rome. We paid to do the Colosseum. That is the only way you can see it. There is no free entry. However later we discovered that we could see as much of the Forum from the pavements running alongside the Forum as we could see being in the Forum. The forum and other forums that existed , built by different emperors, were below our feet wherever we stood. 


On the day we were at the Form we also had a pass on to the Palatine Hill where the emperors lived. We were exhausted and it was a long climb up the hill. We decided to miss the Palatine Hill. We saw it fifty years ago when we first went to Rome. When we walked over the site of The Circus Maximus we got a good view of many of the palaces on the Palatine Hill.


EATING OUT

Each evening we were in Rome we ate at a different restaurant. One thing connects a lot of these places is that they are family run. Many for decades and some, as for one restaurant we ate in near the Vittoria Emanuelle Monument was obviously passed down through the generations. Photographs on the walls, the generational span of those serving us, the head of the family standing overseeing the restaurant’ s activities. The sense of family and family working together in a business is  a strong element of Italian life. That happens with ethnic minority restaurants here in London too. Eklee, a local fruit and vegetable shop in the road we live is an Iranian family run business. They have lived near us for decades and are part of our community. White British do not have those traditions so much unless perhaps it’s a fish and chip shop or pie, eel  and mash shop in the East End. That tradition unfortunately is probably dying out now. 


The Ludus Maximus. We ate in a restaurant overlooking the site fo this gladiator school.


RELIGIOUS LIFE

Another thing we noticed too were the number of nuns and occasionally white dog collared priests who appeared to roam the city.  Where were they all going and what were they doing? Two nuns were in the same subway carriage with us  back to Manzioni station. They got out before us. Were they academics, teachers, nurses,  house keepers to priests? They could have been anything. Many were young and many were  African or  Asian, some were obviously Italian. Nuns generally wore  light grey , some pale blue or white. I wonder what the colours denoted?  The two on the train wore different colours though I wonder if they were of different religious orders. They seemed to be friends.


We made an attempt at visiting the Vatican museum which includes seeing the Sistine Chapel. The queue stretching down a street along the high walls of Vatican City leading to the museum entrance was verylong. They looked hot andt ired and while we watched did not move. Nobody was let in from the front of the queue. Somebody told us it could take form three to five hours to get in We decided not to attempt this. IT would have taken too much out of ourday. Fifty years ago. When we first visted Rome we saw the Sistine chapel and all the renaissance paintings and artefacts of the museum then. We have memories. 


St Peters.

A couple of times we were approached in the street by official looking guides wearing what appeared to be Vatican badges. They looked official but there was something about them which suggested to us that they were just street hawkers attempting to get our money. We were even told by one that we would never get into St Peters without his help. We took a chance and although we had to join the queues we got into St Peters reasonably quickly and for free by ourselves. We wandered about St Peters without a guide reading the labels and information boards. Of course I think any Roman a Catholic  already has a certain level of background knowledge and history about St Peters and the Vatican imbued into them by being a catholic. It is a magnificent building. All the hyperbole expressed about it is true. We looked carefully at the blackened bronze  statue of St Peter, his foot worn smooth by the touch of centuries of pilgrims, just like everybody else and got a very good view. Also. we gawped admiringly at the Madonna cradling her dead son by Michaelangelo. It is not a big statue but has a lifesize quality to it. However it is the emotion, and depth of human feeling  it portrays that is  impressive. It made us feel that we were looking at the real human tragedy. Marilyn and I made a couple of attempts to photograph the inside of the enormous dome.  The technology Michaelangelo created was new and innoivative for its time.

We went into the crypt beneath St Peters where Popes are buried. It was emotional to see the names of Popes on their tombs who have been the head of the church during my lifetime. I felt as though I knew them.


The tomb of a Pope in the crypt under St Peters.

It was also. interesting to see the family tomb of the Stuarts, those English monarchs and failed monarchs who being catholic were rejected by the English people in the 18th century. Bonny Prince Charlie his father and his brother are buried here.They took refuge in Rome protected by the Pope at the time.


The great encircling forecourt to St Peters where , throughout our lives we have seen on television the crowds greeting a new Pope and watching Christmas services broadcast world wide, hasits Egyptian Needle positioned centrally. The  Romans of course defeated Cleopatra and Marc Antony at the battle of Actium in 30 BCE and took over the Egyptian empire. I wondered if any of the Egytpian needles we came across in various piazzas around Rome were those originally used as central markers in the spine that ran down the middle of the Circus Maximus.


Near the Vatican, after we had visited St Peters, we found a café down a side street. We passed a shop that sold chalices, an elaborate monstrance, candle sticks and thuribles. It also sold chasubles of different colours to denote the different religious times and feasts during the year.  They looked cheep and tacky. I or anybody could walk into the shop and buy a full set of priests garments and altar vessels. Do ordinary people buy these and reenact imaginary religious services at home or among friends? It seemed strange and rather disconcerting. That should not be happening and I am sure the catholic church would not condone such things. 


CATACOMBS

On another day we travelled out of Rome on the 118 bus from a stop near The Circus Maximus. Sam, told us how he had  taken a bus once  outside to the outside of Rome and visited some of the catacombs situated in the countryside where many Christians were buried. I had researched buses Googling which bus we needed. The route was from a stop near the Circus Maximus travelling along the Via Appia Antiqua (The Appian Way). It took us a while to find the right bus stop.We asked a lady who looked up the bus route on her phone app. Romans always were very friendly and the ones we approached to ask the way to somewhere invariably spoke very good English. She pointed out the location of the bus stop. Bus stops in Rome, as indeed bus stops in London  do,display bus numbers and also show the bus route with all the stops listed. The 118 bus was the right bus for us. As we wated other buses went past. Two youngItalian ladies were standing nearby waiting for a bus too. This was the first time marilyn and I had used the buses in Rome. I approached the two. young ladies and explained we had never been on a bues in Rome before. I asked If we could tap in with our debit cards or phones to pay for the bus travel when we boarded?One smiled and said nothing. The other behind dark sunglasses just looked inscrutable, stony faced, emotionless, as though she was staring me down and  ignoring me at the same time. I was about to turn away when the inscrutable one suddenly said,

”Yes, you can tap in and you get 75 minutes of travel.”

Her English was perfect and her accent clear. I was a little taken aback and replied, 

“Thank you.”

We tapped in when we boarded the bus. It took us past the Circus Maximus and at a road junction we travelled into what was like a tree lined tunnel through one of the ancient gateways, the Porto San Sabastiano, the largest gate in the Aurelian Walls (a massive 19-kilometer ancient fortification built by Emperor Aurelian between 271 and 275 AD to protect Rome from Germanic invasions),that stretched either side and along a straight cobbled road lined by walls topped with shrubbery and trees poking over. This was the Via Appia Antica.


Waiting for a bus , number 118, on the Appian Way.

The Appian Way was built in 312BC. Romes first major road. It connected Rome to Brindisi in south east Italy. The road is named after Appius Claudius Caecus  the Roman censor who, during the Samnite Wars, began and completed the first section as a military road to the south in 312 BC. The Republic used the Appian Way as a main route for military supplies for its conquest of southern Italy in 312 BC and for improvements in communication. The Appian Way, essential to the Romans, was the first long road built specifically to transport troops outside the smaller region of greater Rome.


As we travelled on the bus south east of Rome we were aware of where we were on this ancient road but we had not formed a plan. Where where were we going? What would we see? As we passed out of the confines of the ancient walls we first came a cross a small church on the left located at a junction with the Via Ardeatina leading off the Vis Appia Antica to the right, but didn’t give it much attention until later in the evening back at our hotel we did a little more research on The Appian Way.

This church is called Santa Maria in Palmis, also know as Chiesa del Domine Quo Vadis. The present building was built in 1637 but there has been church on the ste since the 9th century. It is reputed to be the site where according to The Acts of Peter, Peter, fleeing Rome, came across the risen Christ while he was fleeing persecution in Rome. According to the tradition, Peter asked him, "Lord, where are you going?" (Latin: Domine, quo vadis?). Christ answered, "I am going to Rome to be crucified again" (Latin: Eo Romam iterum crucifigi). 


The phrase QUO VADIS cropped up in the popular TV series MASH. Henryk Sienkiewicz wrote the novel Quo Vadis: A Narrative of the Time of Nero (published in instalments between 1895 and 1896).[4] The book in turn has been made into films several times, including a 1951 version that was nominated for eight Academy Awards. Sienkiewicz received the 1905 Nobel Prize for Literature.


The bus travelled on. We kept seeing signs to various monuments. On impulse we decided to get off the bus and walk. There wasn’t much to see from the road. A young gentleman walked past us. He had walked the distance from Rome. We asked him where the monuments were and he had as much clue as we did.  The we saw ahead of us a small sign to a doorway in the wall on the right. Some people were exiting onto the road. We asked them what was there. They told us it was the catacombs di San Callisto. We entered and discovered an open area with car parking, shops and a small chapel. We bought tickets for an English speaking tour of the catacombs. A French gentleman who normally did the French tours took us. His English was broken but he did is best . The catacombs go deep into the ground cut into a rock called tufa, a soft porous volcanic rock but highly durable. It was easy for slave workers to dig tunnels and galleries of shelving for interned bodies to lie. I asked our guide a question it seemed he hadn’t been asked before. Where did the slave workers live? He thought for a moment and tried to give me an answer. “In houses nearby.” Could that be true? Did they live in the dirt and muck of their excavations perhaps? Their health would not have lasted and an early death from breathing in all the dust would have occurred. Were slaves  prized possessions that were looked after and taken care of? Maybe. I don’t know and I didn’t get an answer to that. What is or was the nature of slavery?


A garden outside of Rome . This was the entrance to the site of catacombs.(2nd century AD)

This set of catacombs was first dug in the 2nd century, It was the resting place of popes, martyrs and Saints as well as the ordinary Christians of the time.  In the 9th century the bodies were  removed to churches in Rome. Along, The Apian, way are other sites of catacombs.


To get back to Rome we waited outside the catacomb complex in the road. A 118 bus eventually came along. We had been told the bus did a circuit from Rome out into the countryside and back to Rome. We took the bus continuing its route beyond the city. Eventually there was a turning area where it paused to give the bus driver a rest and then it took us back to Rome along The Appian Way. This time we got a spectacular view of the Aurelian walls and the Porto San Sabastiano as we approached. There are massive square turrets at even intervals along its length. We could imagine Roman legionaries mounting the parapets and guarding the gateways as travellers and merchants passed through them.


MARILYNS RESEARCH

Marilyn was keen on researching our trip to Rome. She found three churches which had Caravaggio paintings in them. 

The Basilica of Santa Maria del Popolo in the northern part of Rome next to the Villa Borghese estate,  the Basilica of St Agostino and the church of San Luigi dei Francesi close to Piazza Navona and The Pantheon. We managed to get to see two of them.


Two Carravagios.

Walking from the massive white monument to Victor Emaneulle II,  it is immense, consisting of  a curved terrace of pillars, and two porticos flanking the entire structure surmounted by winged charioteers, we walked along narrow side streets towards The Pantheon.  Wherever you go in Rome you discover squares and parts of streets that have ancient ruins. On our way to The Pantheon we inadvertently came across a series of small ruined temples. This we found was where Julius Caesar was assassinated in  44 BC famously on the 15th March. Shakespeare’s quote always comes to mind, “Et Tu Brute?” We walked on to The Pantheon. It fills you with awe and wonder. The dome with the open circular sky light at the top  fascinated architects and builders ever since. Christopher Wren and Michelangelo, learned from its construction. Unfortunately the queue to enter the Pantheon was so long  we  spent time outside walking around it and taking photographs. 

The Pantheon.

Not far and towards the north of The Pantheon we found  the church, San Luigi dei Francesi. It was closed. A tourist, grumbled loudly wondering why a church , in Rome should be shut and off he and his wife walked disgruntled. They hadn’t read the sign correctly. It was closed for lunch and Marilyn and I only had to wait ten minutes before it was opened . Inside churches in Rome you are always met by incredible splendour. The ceilings, the walls , the floors are all works of brilliant art. Gold is often a prevalent colour. This was one of the churches Marilyn wanted to visit to see the Caravaggios.

We found a side chapel to the left of the high altar. In it scientists had set up  laptops, and scanners on tall poles that gradually moved in front of the Caravaggio’s on display. I spoke to a lady who was working on this . She spoke perfect English. Her company were in the process of scanning every work of art within this church. With their technology they were recording the whole church in such fine detail they could record minutiae that the human eye could not pick up. She told us that all this was going to be available for the whole world to access. What a fantastic thing to do.

Marilyn and I stood and looked at the three Caravaggio’s in this small chapel. You can always tell a Caravaggio. The human characters in his paintings are very realistic. You almost feel that they are  present in the flesh, wrinkles, muscles, piercing eyes, the dirt under their fingernails and they depict emotions, pain or ecstasy and often intense concentration. He also uses light and shadows to extreme levels. His shadows are very dark and his light is bright and luminescent. The colours in his paintings really stand out, they have a realism, a glow about them.


It was later when we visited the Basilica of Santa Maria del Popolo in the northern part of Rome, that a Carravagio painting really gripped my attention. It was the crucifixion of St Peter. Three men, their bodies contorted, we don’t see their faces, just their twisted backs and sinewy arms and legs as they lift and tie, and strain everymuscle in their effort to crucify Peter upside down on his cross. Everything is tipped over and at obtuse angles. You can feel the energy , the strength of the men and the effort they are making. Peter is the only face we see strained, his head twisted forward observing what is happening to him, his body contorted and fully aware. I could only try to guess his fear, his determination, the immense psychological stress he was going through. And the light and shadows and the colours glowing off the surface once again.

We didn’t get to visit the Basilica of St Agostino. There are so many places and things we need to go back to Rome for.


We would not have visited the Piazza del Popolo if it hadn’t been for wanting to see the Caravaggio. It is a magnificent piazza. The piazza had another of the Egyptian needles that you find all over Rome. We walked down a street leading off the piazza and came across elegant  and beautiful shops. I spoke to a lady working in a shoe shop and told her how beautiful her shop was. The lighting and colour scheme and the way the shoes were displayed ,as though they were works of art was impressive. I told her so. She smiled and thanked us. The Piazza del Popolo is next to the site of the Villa Borghese, art gallery and large park with monuments. We need to go back to see that and spend more time in the area. The House of Borghese is a prominent Italian noble and papal family , that still have many wealthy descendants today. They originated from Siena. The family rose to great wealth and power in 1605 when Camillo Borghese was elected Pope Paul V. Their extraordinary legacy in Rome includes massive art patronage, a grand gallery, and an historic villa.


THE TREVI FOUNTAIN

On our second night in Rome we found the Trevi Fountain. After visiting the Piazza Navona and walking north east to The Parthenon we walked on to find the Trevi Fountain. There are lots of shaded narrow streets around the Trevi. We knew we were approaching the fountain. We could hear a distant hum. It was a strange sound, like  a massive swarm of bees might make. Neither of us had heard anything like it before. As we turned a corner we found ourselves in the Piazza di. Trevi. Thousands and thousands of people filled the piazza. Everybody was crushed in and before us was the fountain, statues of horse gods, nymphs positioned on rough hewn blocks of rock, surmounted by  white architectural pillars , a central inset half domed niche and series of classical styled windows and balconies evenly balanced either side of the central statue of , Titan , the god of the sea.


The Trevi Fountain

The fountain was spectacular. For all the thousands crowding around it we got a good view from afar but we also got close to the railings Infront of the aqua blue water of the expansive basin Infront of the fountain. The water for the fountain is supplied by the Aqua Vergine now called the Aqua Virgo one of the aqueducts that supplied water to Rome in 19BC. In 1629 Pope Urban commissioned Gian Lorenzo Bernini to sketch possible renovations to an earlier fountain. A competition for designing and building the fountain was organized by Pope Clement XII. Eventually Nicola Salvi was chosen over a design entered by Alessandro Gallilei a Florentine. The fountain has been refurbished over the years . The most recent was financed by the fashion house Fendi. It was begun in 2014 and finished in 2015. A hundred led lights were installed which at night lights up the fountain. The fountain nowadays recirculates its water. In 2023 a climate group of activists dyed the water with charcoal. It had to be completely emptied and cleaned. Nowadays you have to buy a ticket to be able to throw coins into the fountain. Marilyn and I didn’t get close enough to do that.


After we had spent time experiencing the crowds and the excitement of seeing the fountain we turned down a side street and surprisingly came across a restaurant that had tables available. It was a busy restaurant but not crowded or overwhelmed even for being alongside such a crowd attraction. We were shown a table next to the window looking out on the street and the people outside. We had a pizza and a bee and got to watch people walking past which is always an interesting pursuit.


WALKING AND FUTURE PLANS

In our four days we saw a lot of Rome. We  walked every day, looking, discovering and finding out. There is always more, lots more to discover. Since we have returned our minds have kept thinking about Rome. Two places we did not explore were, from ancient times, the Golden House of Nero in the Parco del Colle Oppio. We walked along the road that boarded the south of this park  to get from our hotel to the centre . We knew there were ruins there but did not realise how important they were in the development of ancient Rome. We also walked past a street in which is located  The Museum of Liberation. It records the German Occupation of Rome especially from September 1943 to June 1944. It had been a German embassy building but it was turned into a prison and interrogation centre by the SS. They tortured and interrogated members of the Italian Resistance there. It is important to explore different aspects of a city and not just one historic period. 


The monument to Victor Emmanuel II  (construction begun 1885. He lived 1820 to 1878.)


GENERIC ROME

Rome  at first makes you think of a generic Imperial period, Julius Casar, Augustus, Caligula, Nero and all that. I’ve lumped those together but they created each a different Rome, a different iteration of Romanness. But even those ancient imperial sites developed, changed , were rebuilt during the lives of those emperoros. The Roman Empire developed changed from small riverside village to a republic and eventually a massive empire which itself eventually failed, collapsed and disintegrated. Many elements of which still resonate today. Power empire growth, decline and final destruction are inevitable stages. The way the world is organised and run now is based on this past. We even compare present day Presidents, Governors, Prime Ministers, rulers of today to the rulers of the Roman Empire. It is a complex place worth taking a long time to explore. A place that needs perpetual study.

It is important to remember that what you see , the ruins of temples, the Colosseum and all the other sites are the results of change over centuries. Things, places, were adapted, changed, rebuilt, added to by different Emperors and to respond to different historical circumstances and events. 

There was not one fixed static Roman Empire. It developed, grew, changed and eventually collapsed. More recent centuries have seen abandonment, dereliction and the use of stones from these ancient buildings in the construction of new buildings.

The Arch of Constantine between the Colosseum and the Forum is a magnificent example. Historians argue over its origin and meaning. It was first built before Constantine possibly by the Emperor Maxentius. The senate repurposed it to commemorate Constantine’s victory  over the Emperor Maxentius at the battle of the Milvian Bridge. Bits of other arches , carvings, insignia have been added to it. Mussolini and the fascists in the 1930s adapted it to their purpose too.


RETURN

Marilyn and I have this overriding sense that we must go back and explore further. We have hardly plumbed the depths of what Rome is.We put a lot into our five days in Rome but we need to do more.



















Friday, 8 May 2026

“The Other Bennet Sister,” a 10 part series based on the novel by Janice Hadlow: A Review.

 



Janice Hadlow based her novel The Other Bennet Sister on Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice. It is what is termed as an adaptation but fits into the spin off genre. Spin off novels based on Jane Austen usually means Pride and Prejudice and what happens to Elizabeth and Fitzwilliam Darcy in the years after the novel ends. I decided to watch the first episode, I must admit, merely because I wanted to have a view about what other people in the Jane Austen world would undoubtedly talk about.


The first episode changes the stories focus to Mary Bennet, played by Ella Bruccolerie, the third and middle of the Bennet sisters, set within the parameters  of the original novel.Her other sisters appear, Fitwilliam Darcy  makes an appearance and Mrs Bennet, the incomparable Ruth Jones,  features strongly from the start. The matriarch whose aim in life is to get her daughters married becomes ferocious in her efforts to get Mary settled with an eligible husband. The ineffectual Mr Bennet is played by Richard E Grant and he plays his part well in his interactions with Mary which is, as in the novel, trying to limit the affect Mary has on an audience with her piano playing and singing, which is average and pedantic and not  performance worthy. Mary embarrasses the rest of her family. 


Mary is not deamed attractive like her other sisters. She does not have the feminine skills that a  well bred young lady in search of a husband requires. At the end of the first episode my thoughts were that,yes, the focus is on Mary and we discover Marys confused feelings and thoughts about herself. The rest of the Pride and Prejudice story was flat, a mere ghost of the original,  a necessary backdrop.However once Mr Bennet has died, and the original story is left behind, the story of Mary really takes off. I became gripped. 


There are not many adaptations and spin offs of original novels that have been successful over the years, especially written hundreds of years after the original. A writer in a different century can’t possibly copy or continue the original. The Wide Sargasso Sea by  Jean Rhys a feminist post modern novel, a spin off from Charlotte Brontes novel Jane Eyre, explores marriage from the point of view of Bertha Mason, Mr Rochester’s mad wife in the attic. Racism and feminism are the  key themes. It is an excellent novel which stands on its own.

This adaptation of Pride and Prejudice explores women’s narrow lives and opportunities or the lack of them in the 18th century. It also explores what it is to be human at any time, learning to believe in yourself and making choices never mind how hard, given the society you live in. As such I think this adaptation is a  piece of literature that can stand alone from its original source. A difficult thing to pull off.


There were clues that made me think of  the 18th century feminist writer Mary Wollstonecroft who has been so important to our attitudes and the beliefs we have today.


Mr Ryder, played by Laurie Davidson is wealthy and inherits an estate. He offers marriage to Mary at the end of the series, only after first, earlier,  suggesting they go off to tour Europe and  live in Rome together without getting married. A kind of pseudo nod to Wollstonecroft. An idea at the time that would have destroyed her. 


Gracechurch Street in The City of London today.

The other thing that suggested Wollstonecroft to me was the attitude of the Gardeners, played by Indira Varma and Richard Coyle, the Bennet sisters aunt and uncle, who live in Gracechruch Street in the City of London. Gracechurch Street was an area of warehouses, multiculturalism and non comformist religions such as the Quakers and the French Huguenots..Wollstonecroft was a noncomformist. The Gardeners lived in. this area dominated by the East India Company offices and warehouses. An area of enlightenment ideas  that perculated up into society from the coffee houses. The Gardeners wanted Mary to be happy on her own terms and do whatever she wanted in life. 


In the first episode Mary dances twice  with the local optician at a ball in Meryton to the strong disaproval of her mother. An optician was a lowly tradesman. Mary was not following and seemed to be unware of the decorum young ladies of her class should follow. Later in the series she meets him again  in a London Park, when both have taken their own course in life. They stop to talk.  He suggests  that  to be happy Mary should be herself. An echo of the Gardiner’s wishes for Mary.


The entitled, unintelligent Mr Collins, played superbly by Ryan Sampson,  starts out as boorish as we all think he is from the original but he develops and appears to be on course to change and most importantly he becomes reflective. He begins to understand other peoples view of himself. He is aware of his failing and unhappy marriage to Charlotte Lucas, played by Anna Fenton Garvey who herself is almost desperate with her lot in life. Mary gives Mr Collins some advice to look for the good  in Charlotte. The viewer begins to think there might be some hope for Mr Collins and Charlotte. Mary  had been reading Fordyces Sermons, a book Mr Collins initially approved of and which  lead her to focus on intelligence, piety and living a disciplined life.Mr Collins who appears to be developing an understanding of true human relationships ,gives Mary the advice to be hersef and perhaps in so doing was advising against the strict limiting views of Fordyce. He too now suggests that Mary should let herself to be free. This refrain echoes throughout the series.

Mary Wolstonecraft,  thought marriage was a form of legal prostitution in the 18th century. For  a marriage to be on equal terms between the man and the woman, she thought women should be educated as boys. They should be able to take up careers in medicine, science and education. Inheritance should favour women as much as men, whoever is the eldest sibling in the family. They should be able to run businesses. By default, “shore wives’” the wives of Royal Naval Captains and officers often remained at home and became proxy financiers, business women and landlords while their husbands were at sea  often for years. .Jane Austen ,through her own naval brothers  would have known about women like this. Only when women who are equal in the ways  Wollstonecraft described ,  can love truly flourish among equals. If women are only good for sewing, playing the piano , dancing and looking pretty, with no understanding about the world and able to hold a deep conversation then what worth are they?  There are characters in Jane’s novels that can be seen as examples of the ineffectual wife, Lady Bertram in Mansfield Park for instance.

Not only did Janice Hadlow explore the enlightenment ideas of Mary Wollstonecroft about relationships she includes the Romanticism that William Wordsworth developed  with  his friend Samuel Coleridge. Mr Hayward, played by Donal Finn ,recites ,  William Wordsworth's, "Composed upon Westminster Bridge September 3rd, 1802", to Mary Bennet.  He also recites lines from Tintern Abbey to her during a later, pivotal scene in a rowing boat while in the lakes. This helps Mary develop an emotional awakening. Romanticism and the Enlightenment are often seen as opposites but I think in many ways they are two sides of the human experience.


At the top of a fell in The lake District. ( It was a misty day. A bit like the scene Mary experiences.) 



Janice Hadlow, has looked at the plight of women in the 18th century and explores what life was like for women  by way of Mary Bennet, the least likely of the Bennet sisters to ever marry or make something of herself.  

Mary also learns to stand up to her mother in the end and tells her that she wants to be herself and be happy as an unmarried woman. She finds London and living with the Gardiners liberating.Mary becomes the governess to the Gardiner children. She gets a job. She wants to explore what London has to offer. Both very Mary Wollestonecroft.

The Gardiners take Mary to The lake District. In the original novel, when they travel to Derbyshire with Elizabeth they intend to go on to The Lake District but that journey is never taken.In this story they eventually go to The lakes with Mary where other friends and acquaintances also gather. Although Snowdonia, the Welsh mountains, are used for filming, the lakes and mountains are spectacular. It is here the rivalry between Mr Ryder and Mr Hayward for Mary’s hand is closely fought. 

When in The Lake District, walking up to the top of Scafell Pike, the tallest mountain in England, Mary experiences a storm which moves her emotionally. The diaries of Dorothy Wordsworth, come to mind. Mary is walking in the footsteps of Dorothy. A further development in her emotional journey.

Only after rejecting the idea of ever marrying, and deciding to make her own way by being a governess and deciding to be happy by herself and confident in herself does she find freedom. It is then that marriage to Mr Hayward who all along has wooed her with poetry and listened to what she has to say becomes possible. He himself had given up the prospect of marrying Mary mainly because the land owning wealthy Mr  Ryder  had finally proposed. His humility and willingness to want happiness for Mary above all else wins the day. They had both learned to let go and believe in themselves before marriage was possible it seems.

The story of The Other Bennet Sister is set in the 18th century but its depth of human understanding and personal development ,just like in Jane Austen’s novels such as Emma, teach us something about life and living today. There is good advice. I think this series and supposedly the book , which I haven’t read and now must, teaches us something. If all spin off stories and novels could be as good.



Monday, 23 February 2026

A VISIT TO GRENFELL TOWER 0n Wednesday 14th January 2026.

 


John and I arriving at Latimer Road Station with Grenfell Tower in the distance.

The Grenfell Tower disaster happened on the 14th June 2017.

In the past, a good friend of mine, John and I had talked about visiting the site of Grenfell Tower to see where the conflagration happened. It is easy to think we might have been spectators out of morbid interest.  I think we wanted to get a sense and understanding, if that is possible. 


John and I worked out a route to Grenfell via the Circle Line from Wimbledon. We both got our separate trains to Wimbledon Station then the District Line. It’s always interesting to travel a route we seldom travel. It’s a few years since I took this line. Through Putney, across the Thames on through Fulham Broadway to Earls Court. We changed at Earls Court to take the branch line to Hammersmith, with its music and theatre history. I saw The Who at Hammersmith Odeon when I was 19 years old. John and I had a coffee in a shop outside of the station. From there we walked to the Hammersmith and Circle Line station which took us to Latimer Road. We got out of the train and there, nearby, we both got our first view of Grenfell Tower dressed in its white cladding and giant green hearts.


Grenfell Tower from the roads around.

It was reasonably easy to find the site of the tower which is now a ,”deconstruction,” site with a crane overarching it and site workers in hard hats busy with its gradual demolition. One road to it was barred by gates and fences. A friendly and understanding site worker said our route was barred to pedestrians now. We wanted to find the memorial garden and he directed us  in the direction we needed to walk.


Teresa May visiting Grenfell the day after the disaster.

I have a flickering memory of seeing this on the news on the day of the tragedy. These same streets full of firefighters , hoses and fire engines, search lights lighting up the vicinity. At the time  Theresa May was the Prime Minister. She visited the sight the day after the tragedy to meet with firefighters and the police. A picture shows her standing amongst a group of firemen ,a fireman explaining what had happened his arm pointing and Theresa may looking up in the direction he pointed. What she did not do is meet with any of the survivors which she has been strongly criticized for. She herself regrets not doing that. She has met survivors since. She quickly announced a full inquiry and stated then that the people of Grenfell Tower had been failed . Already those in authority knew it was their failings. Years of government cutbacks and a failure to keep to strict building and construction standards. I have read the report which is available free online from the National Archives  all these nine years later. It confirms in great detail many of the failings that people knew about then.



John and I walked the streets, Whitchurch Road, Treadgold Street, Grenfell Road, Sirdar Road. We walked past St Clements Church. We stood on the steps and of the forecourt to Kensington Leisure Centre near the tower. We looked at the Kensington Aldridge Academy close to the Tower and entered the basement of the low level flats in Whitchurch Road and talked to the security guard on duty in the entrance. These places were crucial to what happened as the fire unfolded and in dealing with the aftermath of the disaster.


Kensington Leisure Center next to the tower.

The inquiry report describes how there was a lack of response from Kensington and Chelsea and in particular the TMO (the Tenant Management Organisation). Lack of trust, lack of communication and future planning all failed the occupants of Grenfell and it was places such as St Clements Church nearby that was used as a drop in centre and a warehouse for resources the tenants needed in the aftermath that came to the fore. The Kensington Leisure Centre was the main emergency relief centre. It was initially chaotic because of the lack of any organisation by the council. Kensington Aldridge Academy  the secondary school within the shadow of Grenfell ,had to be evacuated and closed down. It was placed in temporary accommodation for a year until it could return to its premises. 


The entrance to Baseline Business Studios.

John and I went down the steps into the cavernous basement area to the flats near Grenfell. It is now a vibrant hub of workshops and local businesses, a collective called Baseline Business Studios. A poster in a window read ,”Your Home, Your Community, Your Area.”

It is a local office space and enterprise space that supports economic growth for local start ups. There are various occupation categories including local businesses, community organisations, council services and commercial enterprises. Some of the startups include Lancaster West Neighbourhood Team, part of the housing management that was established in 2018 after the fire in response to the Grenfell tragedy. It provides an open front door for residents who have any queries. This was a service that Kensington and Chelsea had certainly not provided for the tenets in the past. Another company is Red TV Management that includes a design group. Hand Painted Ceramics is run by Suzanna KatKhida. The north Kensington Law centre is here. V Plus V Internal is an architecture group that also designs furniture. United Living Property Services provides property services such as regeneration, building maintenance and building safety. Ther are up to forty different businesses in this basement area.I presume resources and finance were provided for these things after the fire to help regenerate Grenfell.


One of the high level walkways near Grenfell Tower.

John and I walked along some of the high level concrete walkways that connect the local low level flats in our exploration of the area around the tower. At one location we were so close to the weather sheeting that cover the tower we could almost reach out and touch it. People are living in these flats connected by these walkways. Grenfell is  constantly in their minds and in their vision. What memories and experiences these people have we can only surmise. We saw local residents walking along the same walkways John and I walked along. It would have been insensitive to speak to people about what happened.  John and I felt acutely aware of where we were and what happened here. I wonder now what they must have thought of us walking about. They would know we weren’t locals.


Grenfell Tower and the memorial garden.


For a while we stood in the area beside the tower that is a memorial garden. There are photographs of people who died and tributes to them. There are large green and red hearts with the word ,Grenfell, in the centre. Large white areas of wall are written on by local people and survivors remembering various individuals. Teenagers, I guess from Kensington Aldridge Academy, have written poems. 

I will use the title and spellings of the displayed poems.

Here are parts of three poems.

Regeia Yasin 14 years of age wrote.

REMEBERING GRENFELL : A Promise For Justice.

“Hi everyone.

Today we are here to remember Grenfell

And more importantly the people we lost

…………………………….

They weren’t just victims of a fire

They were failed by a system that should have protected them

……………………………….

…….the people in that tower deserved so much better”

Karnis Julian 14 wrote. 

(This brought tears to my eyes.)

“My Life After That Day.

It has been 8 years since there

Has been a hole in my heart

…………………………..

We saw our parents crying.

Life changed that day.

I remember after that day I was worrying  if my best friend Taleen was still alive

I started to go to therapy

…………………………………….

My life after that day became scary.”

Taleen Ahmed 14 years old wrote.

“SEVENTY TWO

Seventy two. We speak each name

Seventy two with lives unfinished

………………it was cut by greed and those who lied

………………ignored the vulnerable.”



John and I stood in silence for a minute and then said a prayer to the dead and the bereaved.

Then we read some of the handwritten comments on the white areas where many have written their thoughts.

This is what some wrote.

“ This should never happen again. RIP.”

“Burning is his way. X Partner forever Bev.”

“Love & never forgotten ever. My only wish is to turn back time.”

“To see you again. See you on the other side.” RIP Ray and Karen.

“Heartbroken. Took Marley.”

“Forever in our hearts.”


The comments go on and on. There are masses of them. A whole web of thoughts and feelings. It’s heartbreaking seeing them written with love and pain. A catastrophic event like Grenfell will affect individuals, families, friends the community forever. It will always be there.

Grenfell Tower was built in 1974 two years after Trellick Tower  a few miles away. The fame attached to each of them could not be more different. Trellick is a design icon, a listed building with literary and film history attached to it. It is a 1970’s historic gem.

Grenfell Tower burned down on the 14th June 2017 killing 72 people and making hundreds homeless.

The next day the Prime Minister, Theresa May set up a public inquiry into the disaster.

In the introduction to the first part of the inquiry report it states,

“On the morning after the fire the Prime Minister announced that there would be a public inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the fire and on 28 June 2017 I was appointed to act as its chairman. On 15 August 2017 the Inquiry was formally set up under the Inquiries Act 2005 (the Act);”


A memorial wall.

The inquiry was lead by The Rt Hon Sir Martin Moore-Bick. One of the thoughts that always occurs when an inquiry like this is set up is has the right choice of person to lead the inquiry been made? The government, the nation as a whole and certainly the people of Grenfell want somebody who is going to carry out a thorough inquiry that leaves nothing unexamined.

Was Sir Martin Moore Bick the correct person to carry out this inquiry? 

The Guardian published an article explaining there were doubts about his suitability.

“Educated at the Skinners’ school in Tunbridge Wells and at Christ’s College, Cambridge, he became a barrister in 1969 and spent more than 20 years as a judge of the commercial court and the court of appeal. There were reports that there had been a delay in announcing his appointment because of concerns in Downing Street over his record on the bench.

In one 2014 case, Moore-Bick said Westminster council could rehouse Titina Nzolameso, a single mother with five children, more than 50 miles away in Milton Keynes. He ruled that it was not necessary for Westminster to explain in detail what other accommodation was available and that it could take “a broad range of factors” into account,” including the pressures on the council, in deciding what housing was available.

In light of this, how would he treat the tenants of Grenfell? 


I have read most of the report. It is more than 2500 pages long. I  read the introductions and conclusions to the different  volumes that constitute each of the two parts. Some of the chapters I have read in more detail . In particular the parts about how the construction and building trade constructed their cladding and how it was tested and given British Standards approval. 


The tone is detached, dealing with facts and assessments of the evidence but it is written in an accessible language that is not too technical and can be read and understood by any  person. It also has a sensitivity towards the people of Grenfell. You get a sense that Sir Martin  Moore Blick is on the side of the people of Grenfell and he is doing his very best for them. I have found no criticism of him and his report from the people of Grenfell.


I will try and provide an overview of what the report says. I have been left gasping, shocked and annoyed. I felt angry reading it. 

The Grenfell Report reveals many failures but I would like to begin with the relationship the people of Grenfell Tower had with the local authority, The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea known as RBK in the reports.  The council gave any dealings with  people in social housing to what is termed  the TMO,  the Tenant Management Organisation.  The TMO had lost the trust between itself and the people of North Kensington. They had ignored complaints about the need for repairs for years. They saw certain individuals who lead the many complaints as the enemy. The TMO had no real plans in place to deal with any disasters that might occur. The poorly designed plan they had was inadequate. The Royal Borough also had a plan but it too was inadequate and was long out of date and there was no communication or links between it and the TMO. Local government buildings regulation officers lacked experience and training. 


The London Fire brigade, perhaps through lack of funding over years had inadequate training and inadequate resources to deal with anything on the scale of Grenfell. They couldn’t deal with the large number of 999 calls from people located in the flats and often they could not interpret the information they were being told. There was also a lack of communication with firefighters and other organisations on the ground. The LFB also were working on plans that had been created fifteen years previously before the refurbishment of Grenfell which made their plans useless. The ,”stay put,” policy, the order for people to remain in their flats was fundamentally wrong. When the LFB realised that the, stay put, policy could not work they were slow in changing the approach.



The London Metropolitan Police Force were successful in controlling the area when the fire broke out but much of their key equipment such as the latest helicopter surveillance from the air was being repaired at the time. Helicopters were in the air monitoring what was going on but the equipment’s inadequacies made the surveillance unhelpful.


One fundamental weakness in the response was the lack of communication not only between the LFB’s own call centres with its own firemen but also between the services, the police, the fire brigade and the council itself. Nobody knew what the others were doing in effect. Returning to the police helicopters monitoring of the fire, they could not link their video footage of what was happening  with the other services. There was no link in communication . The newer helicopters that were grounded did have the more up to date equipment which would have allowed them to communicate with all the services but they were not in use.


There was of course a fundamental lack of training and planning in all areas. The government at the time, first under David Cameron, who introduced austerity measures and then at the time of Grenfell, Theresa May, who was continuing the austerity approach, was all about cut backs and saving money. The government minister in charge of building rules, regulations and safety was an inexperienced junior minister. 


The companies that made the insulation Arconic, who made the rainscreen panels, Celotex, the foam insulation, Siderise, who made the cavity barriers and Kingspar who created a false market in insulation, that had recently been put onto Grenfell tower was probably the greatest cause of death and in creating a disaster. There is a strong argument for criminal proceedings against people who knowingly sold and promoted cladding and insulation they knew was dangerous and inflammable. The testing that had been done on the materials used was inadequate. It was not carried out in realistic situations. The British Standards organisation took the information  the companies  provided about the materials at face value and passed them for use. They carried out no tests themselves.


The streets and community around Grenfell.

THE FIRE:

The fire began in flat 16 at 2.12 am because of an electrical fault in a large fridge freezer in the kitchen. The people in the flat were Mr Kebede, Ms Afeworki and Ms Kinfin. The occupants were found to carry no blame for what happened. From the kitchen the fire entered the cladding on the outside of the building.  

A fire of that relative modest size was perfectly foreseeable by the designers of the flats. The original concrete construction was actually designed to contain a fire within a single flat. This lead of course to London Fire Brigade’s original stay put policy. All the occupants were told to stay within their flats for safety. However, because of lack of updates over the years to the LFBs planning for such a fire in a block like this, that policy  no longer pertained. 

As we know the flats had been refurbished with flammable materials that were not in the original design. As well as insulation cladding which was attached to the outer walls  an aluminium rain shield was placed over the new insulation that itself was also lined with flammable materials. There was a gap between the rain shield and the insulation creating a flu for hot air and flames to pass up the building. The initial fire could possibly still have been contained within the flat itself if other factors had not occurred. Many of the extractor fans in the kitchen areas did not work and often were jammed open to create an air flow. But more importantly the windows now created the biggest hazard. In the refurbishment the windows had been replaced. The new windows were smaller than the original windows and the gap around the new windows had been filled with inflammable materials. The window in  flat 16 was the cause of the fire getting from the flat to the outer cladding. Windows in the other flats throughout the block, which failed too, were the cause  of the fire entering the flats.

Within twenty minutes the fire had reached from flat 16 to the top of the block up the east face. The top had been decorated with inflammable materials and so it soon continued around the top of the flats before descending down the other three sides burning the aluminium composite rainscreen panels that had polyethylene cores which became a source of fuel. Nothing complied with any sort of robust building regulations.


St Clement with St Marks Church next to Grenfell Tower.

The poor planning by RBKC and the TMO was dire. They had nothing in place to deal with the now homeless people from the flats or dealing with the families of the bereaved. It was local people, local churches and the community centre that dealt with the aftermath.


The London Metropolitan Police have been conducting their own criminal inquiry in parallel to the Government inquiry. This year 2026, nine years after the disaster should be the year we find out if there will be criminal prosecutions. Of course there should be. There were failings in every aspect of running the social housing in the borough. There were failings in every aspect of the construction trade. There were failings in every aspect of the responding organisations. Many people who were part of the council, the fire brigade or the police are not culpable because they were part of failing organisations that was not their fault. The people at the top running these organisations and making unsafe decisions often knowingly should have criminal prosecutions brought against them though.

Since the Grenfell disater the numbers of buildings discovered that need remedying have increased. The honest truth is the authorities do not know how many buldings of 11 meters or below , the lower rise buildings, need putting right. The 18 plus meter buildings, such as Grenfell , the numbers are about five hundred. They say 95% of these  have been remedied so far. The governement is talking about the end of 2029 before all 11 meter buildings and lower are put right.  There are of course other sorts of flammable cladding that is different from the Grenfell cladding that needs putting right. In some government reports there are statements, almost of desperation, where they wonder if all buildings can be found that need remedying. The thing is of course that standards need to be high for all new builds so the problem isn't increased. The government say this in place.

On reflection, reading about the  web of complicity and how many bad decisions all came together I think the report provides a view in microcosm of how our country in many aspects is governed. Everywhere you look there are failures which affect us all.


 LONDON FIREBRIGADES RESPONSE

https://www.london-fire.gov.uk/about-us/grenfell-tower-fire/grenfell-tower-fire-news-archive/

BBC NEWS ARTICLES

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/topics/cnw8ynk633gt

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cj9lg4yrpeko

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvg1eje2jg4o

ROYAL BOROUGH OF KENSINGTON AND CHELSEA RESPONSE

https://www.rbkc.gov.uk/grenfell-response-and-recovery/grenfell-tower-inquiry

THE GUARDIAN

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/jun/28/grenfell-tower-inquiry-judge-retired-martin-moore-bick

LONDON METROPOLITAN POLICEC RESPONSE TO THE GRENFELL REPORT

https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/grenfell-tower-investigation

https://www.met.police.uk/foi-ai/metropolitan-police/disclosure-2023/october-2023/investigative-information-relating-grenfell-fire-case/

THE GRENFELL INQUIRY REPORT HELD IN THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES

Phase 1 full report in The National Archives

https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20250320040117/https://www.grenfelltowerinquiry.org.uk/phase-1-report

Phase 2 full report in The National Archives

https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20250320032754/https://www.grenfelltowerinquiry.org.uk/phase-2-report


UK GOVERNMENT

https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5901/cmselect/cmpubacc/362/report.html#heading-0


POST SCRIPT: ( 25th July 2026)


Grenfell Street , Mousehole Cornwall.

My family and I have just returned from a holday in Cornwall. We were staying in St Ives. On one of our day trips we visited Mousehole , a beautiful little fishing village on the south coast of the Cornish peninsular near Lands End. Driving down narrow lanes , hardly wide enough for a car, was nerve wracking and precarious but we eventually reached Mousehole and parked by the harbour. As we walked around the streets we saw the street sign near the harbour, GRENFELL STREET, with a green heart on the end part of the sign. Underneath the street sign was an information plaque on the rugged stone wall.

A charity called CORNWALL HUGS GRENFELL ( registerd charity 1177796) was begun by Esme Page as a facebook post on June 20th 2017.six days after the disaster at Grenfell on the 14th June. 

She wrote, 

"I magine if we could put a Cornish Holiday on the horizon for every Grenfell resident and firefighters family, a time to rest, a time to let our beautiful county bless these people and work ts gentle magic."

The charity has provided over 480 respite holidays in Cornwall, 75 of those holidays in Mousehole. Businesses and various organisations contributed to make this happen. The street sign was unveiled by a tower suvivor and bereaved children from the disaster. Among these were Hafsa Khalloud who was 15 at the time, Sara Chebiouni 11 years old Kai 11 and Patch Harvey, the coxswain of the Penlee Lifeboat. He has provided trips on the lifeboat ,Ivan Ellen, for many of the survivors.

The name Grenfell comes from a Cornish family. Pascoe Grenfell MP  lived from 1761 to 1838. His grandson, Field Marshall Francis Wallace Grenfell (1841-1925) gave his name to Grenfell Road in London W11 and Grenfell Tower was named after him. 

Mousehole is not new to disaster. There are plaques located around the harbour commemorating fishing boat and lifeboat disasters when men of Mousehole lost their lives in storms. The most recent being in 1981, when Penlee’s  lifeboat crew drowned. The local pub landlord  Charles Greenhaugh, was among those who perished. .A war memorial commemorates the men of the merchant navy from Mousehole who during the first and second world wars  lost their lives.