So it’s sixty years since the Queen came to the throne after
her father’s death in 1952, while she was on safari in Kenya
with the Duke of Edinburgh. She became Queen on February 6th 1952, the day her father King George VI died. As soon as she heard the news in the house she was staying in whilst in Kenya the documents were presented to her to sign. She became Queen immediately.Her coronation was a year later, in Westminster Abbey, in June 1953. I was born in
the very same year the Queen became our Queen, June 1952. The Queen's Diamond Jubilee, her sixtieth as Queen and my sixtieth
year, coincide. This means that for my entire life I have only known one
monarch on the throne and she seems hale and hearty enough and ready to
continue in her role as our smiling, benign, motherly face of Britain and The Commonwealth, for a few
more years to come. Today, Marilyn, Abi, my youngest and I stood in an enormous
crowd beside The Thames on the South Bank next to The London Eye.
At 3.30pm the
Queen and the Royal family, aboard the Royal barge sailed past amongst a
flotilla of a thousand boats. I can’t say we saw the Queen or the flotilla but
we experienced the crowds amazing warm and heartfelt outpouring of affection
for the Queen. Flags waving, cheering, clapping and a great feeling of warmth
and friendship pervaded the crowds as we watched on large screens the whole
event that was happening a mere few yards away on the river. It was
worth being there.
Having a sit down.
The Queen. " Good afternoon your majesty. I hope you are well?"
What has the Queen’s reign done for me? How has it shaped my
life and made me what I am?
One of the main siren calls and professed aims of many of
those governments over the last sixty years and accelerated by Tony Blair and
the Labour governments he lead, is social mobility. Even our present coalition
government of Tories and Liberals lead by David Cameron still mouth the mantra,
“social mobility is our aim,” and, “ the highest quality of education for all,”
even though many of their policies are going to create the opposite effect.
Michael Gove, like all other ministers for education before him has wrung
his hands and anguished why it is still
predominantly the upper middle classes and those from the wealthier families
who get into Oxford and Cambridge. How can they possibly get more children from
the working class into Cambridge? There is a minority who do already get into
Oxford and Cambridge from a working class background but a very very small
minority. And then, shock amongst many shocks some people still don’t aspire to
higher things such as a great education. The government gasps, “Why not?”
You are not coming this way!!!!!
To be fair, as an addendum to the above comments about the
desirability to go to Oxford and Cambridge, we have many universities in the
top one hundred in the world and Oxford and Cambridge are certainly not
unique as far as academic excellence goes in this country. Oxford and Cambridge
are used as a symbol.
The ONLY way to see the Queen.
But what has this meant for me over these sixty years? Have
the policies and opportunities offered by successive governments during the
Queens reign made me aspirational and
socially mobile? Socially mobile always infers moving up, not down, by the way.
Have I suffered a fracture between my upbringing and my present life because of
different governments emphasise on social mobility?
Some gentlemen of the constabulary.
In many ways I have shifted my social class. By getting a
degree through the Open University and later a masters degree from The
Institute of Education, London University, I have become middle class because
of my educational achievements. One of my brothers got a degree before I did
but I followed soon after and the two of us were the first to get university
degrees in my family. My family always thought of themselves as skilled working
class. Getting degrees did not,
however, create a cataclysmic rift between my brother and I and our family as
happened to Rita, in Educating Rita, where her husband, friends and neighbours
could no longer accept her. By getting an education she had moved sharply out
of her social class. She spoke a different language. She felt and thought
differently. Her family and friends had no aspirations away from the lives they
lived.
Education did not move my brother and I so sharply out of our social
class. My father had studied hard at home in the evenings while working as an
accounts clerk in an office and got his accountancy qualifications. My
grandfather, on my mother’s side, had qualifications. He was a draughtsman in a
shipyard. A great uncle of mine had passed his civil service exams. So being
educated, studying and passing exams was always accepted in my family. Our
family wanted my brother and I to be educated. We were not therefore fighting
against our class or our social situation even if we were the first to get
degrees. We were admired and the way we thought and our aspirations were an
extension of our families’ aspirations for us.
Just look at those trousers.
A decorated balcony just across the road from ,The Old Vic.
One of the greatest things educationally to move people on
and bring a high standard of education within the grasp of all, has been the
Open University, where I got my first degree. The OU was begun in the late sixties under
the Harold Wilson government. To get accepted onto an Open University degree
you need no prior qualifications. You have to show that you can write clearly
and succinctly. The degrees are as academically rigorous as any other
university degree. The degrees are as valuable and well regarded as any other
degree. To achieve an Open University degree, you have to show and prove you
can reach a good academic standard. This was the first real experiment with
flexible further education in this country. Open University degrees are studied
at home in the evenings after a days work. There are summer schools to be
attended and nowadays, with broadband, there is immediate communication with
fellow students, lecturers and tutors. Having a broadband connection also gives
immediate access to resources. The degrees take longer to achieve because they
are part time and they are divided into modules, which you can take one at a
time and when they suit you. All universities offer flexible courses now. There
are many ways to get a degree but the Open University was the first to try new
ways. It is still at the top in this country as far as flexible degrees go and
has been marketed worldwide. It has invariably ranked in the top forty
universities in Britain and has always ranked in the top five hundred
worldwide. Students globally can access Open University courses and gain
degrees. The business school is the most popular in other countries.
Live music at The National Theatre.
An educational revolution hatched by Harold Wilson under the
control of Jennie Lee, who was the minister for education under Harold Wilson,
has given confidence and unsought opportunities to many who thought they had no
chance as well as those, like me, who did not get immediate access to a
university course.
The crowds the crowds!!!!!!!!!!!
I think the Open University has provided a powerful
force for social mobility in this country and has influenced social mobility
worldwide. I think the opportunities offered by education and the education I
have been able to access has been the main shaping influence on my life during
the reign of our Queen.
No more use for a union jack at the end of the day.
And finally , the rain came down!!!!!!!!!!
The Open University: http://www3.open.ac.uk/study/
Educating Rita: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Educating_Rita
The Queens Jubilee picture files from the BBC: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/in- pictures-18329453
IOE. Institute of Education: http://www.ioe.ac.uk/
Dear Tony,
ReplyDeletewonderful post! I have mentioned the Queen's Jubilee on my blog and someone wonder why the English monarchy last for so long? I think part of it is from public politics and a certain finesse, a kind of noblesse oblige that remains in your country. Not everybody of course, but I think all English people have a bit of it. I hope I have expressed myself well!
hugs for you and Marilyn
I had no idea about the public parties, free food and music. I thought it would be one grand parade. Four days of celebration! Coupled with last year's wedding and the upcoming Olympics, you Brits know how to throw a good party!
ReplyDeleteI saw a lot of the Queen's celebration on the telly. ;) It looks like a good time was had by all. I agree with you about education. In the States, some people don't see the value in a bachelor's degree in English or History. "What are you going to do with that?" But it shows that you know how to learn. It took me 15 years to get a two-year degree, but taking those core courses opened me to a lot of ideas and expanded my horizons.
ReplyDeleteTony, I saw a bit of the celebration on television. I don't have cable or dish (sky), so what I saw was limited to what the standard networks offered. Quite marvelous. I wondered if you were somewhere in the crowd! I'm afraid just looking at, let alone being in, a crowd that size unnerves me! My mother and her mother always admired the queen. Wish it had occurred to me to ask them what they had thought of the queen's father.
ReplyDeleteTo commenter Mary: Too true. If a field of study is not going to lead to making money, many Americans say "Why bother."