Recently Marilyn and I went in to the
center of London, initially to attend a lunchtime free concert at St Martins in
The Fields. We heard Emma Stannard, a Mezzo Soprano, singing Grieg, Schumann,
De Falla and Copeland accompanied by Keval Shah on the piano. They were superb displaying
so much personality. The lunchtime concerts begin a 1pm and last for about one
hour. When we came out onto a sunny Trafalgar Square we thought we would like
to have a look in the National Portrait Gallery and see if any exhibitions were
on.
There is a photographic portrait exhibition
on at the moment. We first looked at pictures created by the
Bloomsbury group and portraits of artists,writers and the famous from the 20th
century. We looked at the Tudor and Stuart galleries populated by portraits of
the ,”God ordained”, and eventually wandered
into the Georgian period galleries sauntering past that little sketch of Jane Austen
created by her sister Cassandra and portraits of the great writers and poets of the
late 18th and early 19th century, Sir Walter Scott,
Shelley, Byron and so forth. There are very few women represented in the older
periods. Elizabeth I and Mary Queen of Scots appears in the Tudor period. Some
of Charles II’s mistresses are hung in the Stuart galleries but the Georgian
period is when women start to become ,”really serious.”
The great majority of paintings in the
Georgian Galleries are still of men but
there are a substantial number of women, Jane Austen, Mary Wollstonecraft,
Hannah More, Fanny Burney, Hester Lynch (Mrs Thrale) and Dorothy Jordan,
writers, artists, actors, philosophers, playwrights, society hosts and
emancipationists. These women began to push the boundaries of society showing
what women could do in the world and they were brave and often revolutionary. They
were intellectuals and thinkers of the highest order.They all suffered one way
or the other for their causes in a very strongly male orientated world. They
were courageous pioneers.
The Trial of Queen Caroline 1820 by Sir George Hayter oil on canvas, 1820-1823 (National Portrait gallery)
But there is one painting, with a woman in it, which
could be described as even more inspirational and in some ways is more powerful
than the rest and gets to the heart of what it was to be a woman in the early
19th century. This woman had courage, determination and a will to
live her life the way she wanted. She was prepared to break the law, courted
approbation from everybody, even her friends and supporters, those who might be
on her side were often repulsed regarding her morals and choices in life. In
acting in such a liberating way, she was perhaps even stronger than all the rest.
“The trial of Queen Caroline in 1820,” by Sir George Hayters, is vast. It consists of hundreds of
miniature portraits of men. They are the great men of the early 19th century.
There is William Adams, lawyer and diplomat, Shute Barrington,the Bishop of
Durham, William Cavendish the Lord Chancellor, William Wyndham Greville the Prime Minister,
the Duke of York, George IV’s brother, William Howley, The Archbishop of
Canterbury, William Nelson, 1st Earl Nelson, Lord Nelson’s brother, Arthur
Wellesley, the Duke of Wellington. There are lawyers, landowners, statesmen, the
Governor General of India and various other governor generals. There are Field Marshalls,
bishops and archbishops. Thomas Barnes, the editor of The Times newspaper is there,
politicians of every hue, agriculturalists, bankers, sportsmen, Lords, Earls
and Dukes. The world was run by these men and women were second class citizens
and had to do what they were told. Almost unnoticed, in the midst of this mass
of manhood, sitting calmly and still and unmoved is Queen Caroline of
Brunswick, the estranged wife of George IV.
Caroline of Brunswick.by Sir Thomas Lawrence oil on canvas, 1804. (National Portrait Gallery)
Caroline was born on the 17th
May 1768, a Princess of Brunswick. Her father was Charles William, Duke of
Brunswick and her mother was Princess Augusta of Great Britain and eldest
sister of George III. Her father and mother had a difficult relationship. Her
father had a mistress, who lived with them, called Louise Hertefeld. Caroline
was put in a difficult situation. If she was civil to one the other reprimanded
her. She was also unable to lead the life she would have liked to live while
she was within the same household as her parents. She was forbidden to attend
grand balls except on very rare occasions. She was strictly chaperoned everywhere
by her governess and some elderly ladies of the court. She was refused any
contact with the opposite sex. She was even forbidden to dine with her own
brother. This caused her great anguish and torment. Caroline was not averse to
trying some extreme tricks. She feigned being pregnant on one occasion to
challenge her parents. There were rumours about her from an early age that she
had given birth at the age of fifteen. She often visited the cottages of the
peasantry and it was claimed that on one of these occasions she had got
pregnant.
Her mother and father considered many
suitors for her from1782 onwards. Prince of Orange, Prince George of Hesse and
Charles Duke of Mecklenberg were all suggested but nothing came of this. Her
mother had always hope for a marriage to one of her English cousins. In 1794
Caroline became engaged to the Prince of Wales, her cousin. The reason for this
were mostly political. Britain was at war with France and an Alliance with
Brunswick would help Britain’s cause.
Also George was heavily in debt and if he married an eligible princess,
parliament would increase his allowance. So Caroline was a political pawn.
John
Stanley saw Caroline in 1781 and thought she was an attractive girl. In 1784
she was described as a beauty and she was also described as amiable, lively
witty and handsome by others. On the.20th November 1794 Lord
Malmesbury arrived in Brunswick to escort her to Britain. He wrote in his diary
that, she lacked judgement, decorum and tact, spoke her mind, acted
indiscreetly and often neglected to wash or change her dirty clothes. She
appeared to have no innate notions of morality or the need for it. Malmesbury
gives a damning account of her. It appears to be a subjective account. Caroline perhaps did not wash on purpose to deliberately repel
Malmesbury. She was noted. for taking baths at other times, notoriously with
her lover Bergami.
Carolines betrothal to The Prince Regent was a strange arrangement from the
start. When Caroline arrived in Greenwich with Malmesbury on Easter Sunday 5th
April 1795 she was met by Frances Villiers, Countess of Jersey and Georges
mistress. Frances Villiers had been appointed as Caroline’s Lady of the
Bedchamber. Caroline and George were married in the chapel Royal in St James’s
Palace on the 8th April 1795. Her new husband was drunk and had to be
assisted throughout the ceremony. He thought Caroline unattractive and
unhygienic. He himself had already married Maria Fitzherbert. It was an illegal
marriage because Maria Fitzherbert was a Roman Catholic and through the
Marriages act of 1772 was not legally valid. George, in a letter to a friend
claimed that he had sexual intercourse with his new wife only three times,
twice the first night and once on the second night. He said that he had to make
a great effort to overcome his aversion to her. Caroline later claimed that on
their wedding night George was so drunk he spent the night in the fireplace
where he fell. They must have had sexual intercourse on at least one occasion
because they had a daughter together, Princess Charlotte, George’s only
legitimate child, born at Carlton House on the 7th January 1796.
George’s abuse of Caroline began almost
immediately. Three days after Charlotte’s birth George made out a new will in which he left all his
property to “Maria Fitzherbert, my wife.” But Caroline could give as good as she
got. Caroline was feisty and fought for her rights from the start. Caroline
told Malmesbury that she was disappointed with George because he was,”very fat and he’s nothing like as
handsome as his portrait.” On the other hand George, didn’t like Caroline’s jibes and jokes about
Lady Jersey. As he was expressing his dislike and aversion to
Caroline, George was having an affair with Lady Jersey. The relationship with
Caroline was becoming a disaster. George
also had to contend with public opinion. The press vilified him for his
extravagant tastes especially at a time of war. The public also took sides with
Caroline and portrayed her as the wronged wife and public opinion only grew in
support of her. People liked her because of her ,”winning familiarity and easy
open nature.” George
became dismayed at her popularity and his own unpopularity.
In April 1796, George wrote to Caroline,
“ We have unfortunately been obliged to acknowledge to each other that we cannot find happiness in our union. Let me therefore beg you to make the best of a situation unfortunate for us both.”
“ We have unfortunately been obliged to acknowledge to each other that we cannot find happiness in our union. Let me therefore beg you to make the best of a situation unfortunate for us both.”
In August 1797 Caroline moved to the Vicarage
in Charlton, near Greenwich, on the outskirts of, London. She then moved to
Montagu House in Blackheath. Caroline felt free from the constraints of her
marriage. She had liaisons with Admiral Sir Sidney Smith and Captain George
Manby. She may also have had a fling with the politician George Canning. Her
daughter was put into the care of a governess and lived in a mansion near Montague House.
It appears that Caroline had strong maternal instincts and she adopted a number of poor children who had been fostered out in the Blackheath area. In 1802 she adopted a three month old boy, William Austin. Caroline fell out with her neighbours Sir John and Lady Douglas. They claimed that Caroline had sent them obscene letters. Lady Douglas accused Caroline of infidelity and said that William Austen was Caroline's illegitimate son. In 1806 a secret commission was set up to investigate the accusations. Lady Douglas testified to the commission that Caroline had admitted to her that William Austin was her son.She also told the commission that Caroline had been rude about the Royal Family and she alleged that Caroline had also touched her in an inappropriate sexual manner. The accounts of Caroline’s behaviour could not have been more lurid and frank. More lovers were added to the list, Sir Thomas Lawrence , the artist who had painted Carolines portrait and also Henry Hood the son of Lord Hood were implicated. Carolines own servants could not or would not confirm any of these allegations. As for William Austin, his real mother, Sophia Austin came forward to testify that she had given birth to William. The evidence that was being stacked up against Caroline appeared more and more fictional and fabricated.The commission set up to investigate the initial claims by Lady Douglas announced that there was no foundation for them.
It appears that Caroline had strong maternal instincts and she adopted a number of poor children who had been fostered out in the Blackheath area. In 1802 she adopted a three month old boy, William Austin. Caroline fell out with her neighbours Sir John and Lady Douglas. They claimed that Caroline had sent them obscene letters. Lady Douglas accused Caroline of infidelity and said that William Austen was Caroline's illegitimate son. In 1806 a secret commission was set up to investigate the accusations. Lady Douglas testified to the commission that Caroline had admitted to her that William Austin was her son.She also told the commission that Caroline had been rude about the Royal Family and she alleged that Caroline had also touched her in an inappropriate sexual manner. The accounts of Caroline’s behaviour could not have been more lurid and frank. More lovers were added to the list, Sir Thomas Lawrence , the artist who had painted Carolines portrait and also Henry Hood the son of Lord Hood were implicated. Carolines own servants could not or would not confirm any of these allegations. As for William Austin, his real mother, Sophia Austin came forward to testify that she had given birth to William. The evidence that was being stacked up against Caroline appeared more and more fictional and fabricated.The commission set up to investigate the initial claims by Lady Douglas announced that there was no foundation for them.
By the end of 1811, George III was declared
permanently insane and the Prince of Wales was made Regent. George restricted Caroline’s
access to Charlotte, their daughter, further. Caroline
became more socially isolated. She moved to Connaught House in Bayswater. In
league with Henry Broughton, an ambitious Whig politician who wanted reform, she
began a propaganda campaign against George. George, in response, leaked the testimony of Lady
Douglas to the Commission that had investigated Caroline but Broughton
counteracted these allegations by releasing the testimony of the servants and
Mrs Austin. Their daughter, Charlotte sided with her mother as did the public.
Jane Austen, who was an avid reader of news
journals, wrote of Caroline,
“ Poor woman, I shall support her as long as I can, because she is a woman and because I hate her husband.”
After the defeat of Napoleon in 1814 George tried to restrict his daughter’s visits to her mother even more. Charlotte ran away to be with her mother. She was eventually persuaded to return to her father. There was a risk of public disorder which would make it more difficult for Charlotte in the long run.
“ Poor woman, I shall support her as long as I can, because she is a woman and because I hate her husband.”
After the defeat of Napoleon in 1814 George tried to restrict his daughter’s visits to her mother even more. Charlotte ran away to be with her mother. She was eventually persuaded to return to her father. There was a risk of public disorder which would make it more difficult for Charlotte in the long run.
Caroline now negotiated a deal with the
Foreign Secretary, Lord Castlereagh. She agreed to leave the country for an
annual allowance of £35,000.
On 8th August 1814 Caroline left Britain. She travelled to Brunswick and then to Italy through Switzerland. Probably in Milan she hired Bartolomeo Pergami as a servant. He soon became the head of Caroline’s household.. In 1815 Caroline bought a house on the shores of Lake Como. From early 1816, she and Pergami cruised the Mediterranean. Their relationship became closer and closer. By now gossip about Caroline was rife and even Lord Byron wrote to his publisher that Caroline and Pergami were lovers. By 1817, Carolines debts were growing and she moved from the Villa d’Este to the smaller Villa Caprile near Pesaro. Meanwhile Caroline's daughter, Princess Charlotte had married Prince Leopold of Saxe Coburg. In November 1817 Charlotte gave birth to a stillborn son and then unfortunately died soon after. George refused to inform Caroline of her daughter’s death. Caroline heard the devastating news from an official sent by George to inform the Pope. This was a cruel way to discover the news.
On 8th August 1814 Caroline left Britain. She travelled to Brunswick and then to Italy through Switzerland. Probably in Milan she hired Bartolomeo Pergami as a servant. He soon became the head of Caroline’s household.. In 1815 Caroline bought a house on the shores of Lake Como. From early 1816, she and Pergami cruised the Mediterranean. Their relationship became closer and closer. By now gossip about Caroline was rife and even Lord Byron wrote to his publisher that Caroline and Pergami were lovers. By 1817, Carolines debts were growing and she moved from the Villa d’Este to the smaller Villa Caprile near Pesaro. Meanwhile Caroline's daughter, Princess Charlotte had married Prince Leopold of Saxe Coburg. In November 1817 Charlotte gave birth to a stillborn son and then unfortunately died soon after. George refused to inform Caroline of her daughter’s death. Caroline heard the devastating news from an official sent by George to inform the Pope. This was a cruel way to discover the news.
A salacious cartoon depicting Caroline bathing with her lover Bartolomeo Pergami.
The Vice Chancellor John Leach was asked to
set up a commission to gather evidence of Carolines adultery. This was the only
way George could obtain a divorce from Caroline. Leach sent three commissioners
to Milan to interview Caroline’s servants.. He sent his own brother James to
the Villa Caprile. He reported back that Pergami and Caroline were living as
husband and wife. The Milan commission was gathering more and more evidence.
Caroline informed James Broughton that she would agree to a divorce in exchange
for money. Divorce by mutual consent was illegal however. On the 29th
January 1820 King George III died. George became King and as such she was the
Queen. George demanded that his ministers get rid of her. George now was
determined to divorce Caroline. The best and least painful way to divorce
Caroline was through an act of
Parliament which would make their marriage annulled. Her name was removed from
the liturgy of the Church. but he had to be very careful. His own infidelities
and excesses did not deem him an innocent party in the affair. He could only
divorce Caroline if it was proved she had been unfaithful. He had mistresses and an illegal wife
after all.Divorce proceedings would only bring to light his own misdemeanors.
Rather than run the risk Caroline was offered an increase in her annuity to
£50,000 if she stayed abroad. Caroline rejected the government's offer. She returned
to England on the 5th June. Riots broke out in support of her. She
became the figurehead of a growing radical reform group who demanded change.
The new King still wanted a divorce and submitted the evidence collected by his
commission to Parliamnet in two green bags. They were opend on the 27th
June. Fifteen peers examined the contents and regarded the contents as
scandalous. The government introduced a bill in Parliament, the Pains and
Penalties Bill 1820 intended to take the title of Queen away from Caroline and
to dissolve the marriage. It claimed that Caroline had committed adultery with
a low born man, Bartolomeo Pergami. Various witnesses, including Theodore
Majocchi,one of Caroline’s servants were brought to be questioned.All sorts of
salacious details were revealed.
Caroline came to the reading of the Bill which although not a trail was
virtually a trial and sat there in the middle of this maelstrom. This is the
scene portrayed in , “The Trial of Queen Caroline.”
There Caroline sits, calmly, impassively while the Whig Party lawyers Henry Broughton and Thomas Denham strongly defend her. In the painting, Broughton, arm outstretched, gestures and argues vehemently her case. If you look close lawyers animatedly discuss and Carolines detractors thump their fists on oaken tables. They seem to be dissecting what womanhood is.
There Caroline sits, calmly, impassively while the Whig Party lawyers Henry Broughton and Thomas Denham strongly defend her. In the painting, Broughton, arm outstretched, gestures and argues vehemently her case. If you look close lawyers animatedly discuss and Carolines detractors thump their fists on oaken tables. They seem to be dissecting what womanhood is.
All the witnesses for the prosecution were countered and their evidence shown to be untrue in many cases and eventually there was little prospect that the bill could be passed. During the trial Caroline remained immensely popular.
Caroline stated,
“All classes will ever find in me a sincere
friend to their liberties, and a zealous advocate of their rights.”
She tried to attend the coronation on the
19th July 1821 but was barred from entering Westminster Abbey. Caroline
became ill soon after. She died three weeks later on the 7th August
1821 at the age of 53. She may have had cancer.
Caroline of Brunswick broke ordinary moral
standards, she challenged the laws of the land, she broke through the barriers
between different social strata. She lived the way she wanted and not the way
society or the church or the monarchy would want her to. She was a true
radical, not taking any side but just being herself, come what may.
“ 'There is
a stubbornness about me that never can bear to be frightened at the will of
others. My courage always rises at every attempt to intimidate me.'
She was her own person and did what she wanted.
She also connects with Mary Wollstonecraft’s
ideas about women.
“I do not wish them
[women] to have power over men; but over themselves.”
Wollstonecraft also stated,
“It is vain to
expect virtue from women till they are in some degree independent of men.”
A lot of what Caroline was charged with was
hearsay. A lot of what she was charged with was highly emotive, salacious and
at the extremes of what could be imagined by her contemporaries and truly
shocking to many. Her attackers were out to destroy her and stop her breaking social
codes and beliefs. She was very much a woman alone. In her private life she does seem to have been highly sexual, full of fun and a very warm motherly type who showed her
emotions. These traits, good and bad, make her a real person I think. Recalling her upbringing, when she was
restrained from interacting with other people. in any meaningful way and seeing how naturally vivacious and social she obviously was she must have had a a store of pent up
feelings and emotions ready to explode. She did let them out and in so doing challenged
the world. I think she was a very brave person. She challenged society.
George Sand. another independent woman who challenged society as an independent woman, wrote,
George Sand. another independent woman who challenged society as an independent woman, wrote,
“There is only one happiness in this life,
to love and be loved,”
I hope Caroline found this.
References:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caroline_of_Brunswick
http://www.royalhistorian.com/the-trial-of-queen-caroline-in-1820-and-the-birth-of-british-tabloid-coverage-of-royalty/
http://www.npg.org.uk/
References:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caroline_of_Brunswick
http://www.royalhistorian.com/the-trial-of-queen-caroline-in-1820-and-the-birth-of-british-tabloid-coverage-of-royalty/
http://www.npg.org.uk/
Thanks for this informative article, Tony. Caroline of Brunswick was a strong, brave woman and the fact that Jane Austen admired and supported Caroline suggests that she really was a feminist of her time.
ReplyDeleteThanks Anna. The painting does highlight a level of mysogeny in Georgian times as well as double standards. Marilyn and I stood in front of the painting talking about various parts of it. I hope we didn't obstruct other people from seeing it.
DeleteAll the best, Tony