Thursday, 17 March 2022

PERSUASION (an adaptation of Jane Austen’s novel by Jeff James and James Yeatman) at The Rose Theatre Kingston upon Thames.

 



Marilyn and I went to see Persuasion performed at The Rose on Tuesday 8th March. It maybe strange but  for somebody who professes to know a little bit about Jane Austen it is a long time since I had actually read the novel. I have delved deep into Austen’s novels over the years for quotes and to reference her possible thoughts  and ideas about life and love,  but I have failed to read the whole of the novels since I first read them all  years ago.  I have lost sight. I think, of what Jane actually wrote. So I read Persuasion again and it wowed me. It is a novel that explores the shifting of society  in the early 19th century when much was changing, not just how relationships developed, but the class sytem was adapting and it was the time of the  Industrial Revolution. It seems apposite that at the moment when the world order is actually changing that The Rose Theatre chose Persuasion to dramatise.  


The cast.

I know that good novels, as you read them again over time and  as your own experience of life develops,  reveal  different levels of understanding. So what did I get from reading Austen’s Persuasion this time round before seeing the performance?  The word ,persuasion, is used at times during the novel, but not often. The actual consequences of being persuaded however are felt throughout and drive the novel itself. Anne Elliot was persuaded , eight years previously, by  her father to refuse a  marriage proposal to Captain Wentworth who she really loved. Also Lady Russell the family friend and Anne’s particular friend persuaded her against the match too.  

I find Ann   annoyingly  neurotic. Is that because she has always been pressured by others to go against her own wishes? Does she feel  she has no control over her life?.   Things happen to Anne. She isn't allowed to make things happen for herself. She analyses every situation, almost every word and look to an intense degree. She  always comes out worst. In this novel and in the play she eventually learns to decide for herself. So a major theme has to be how we use people’s advice and how much we should be persuaded when making life decisions for ourselves.


Anne played by Sasha Frost.

Another issue  also, in  terms of Jane Austen’s own experience  are the  relationships she describes. How a woman who never married and who as far as we can tell from the little evidence remaining in her letters, never had a long term and deep relationship, write about relationships that are so real?  Trust, understanding, empathy, a deep love,  passion, lust and sex, how can she possible know? How can she create and explore characters that have deep emotional relationships, that develop over time? How  did she know all this?  Reading Persuasion again and seeing this stage production makes me wonder even more. I suppose we all learn more from failure than success. Maybe it was Jane’s failures in love that informed her at such a deep level?


Captain Wentworth played by Fred Fergus and Louisa played by Matilda Bailes

A novel written in the early 19th century  translated into  a play set in the 21st century, surely, it can’t be done? They are two worlds far apart. How can they possibly come together and meet? There are the wise among us that say Austen is universal in her treatment of relationships. This is true when you drill down to what happens in a  relationship  but all those 18th century rules get in the way to a  translation across centuries, surely? Class status, wealth,  attitudes to money and  the patriarchy  and what seems to us blatant misogyny but wasn’t understood as such in the 18th century, how does it all get transferred to the 21st century? When I read Persuasion again finishing the day before we saw the stage adaptation I couldn’t see anyway that it was possible to achieve that transfer from the 18th century to the 21st century.


Charles played by Dorian Simpson and Mary played by Caroline Moroney.

Think about science fiction, worlds which are created and can’t exist in reality. This play creates a hybrid world  that is half 18th century and half 21st century. Of course there has to be Sir Walter Elliot,  class riven thinking about his baronetcy and getting into debt. Elizabeth too is the,” perfect,” 18th century catch, schooled in all the propriety of 18th century family and filial traditions. Which self respecting 18th century country gentleman or member of the aristocracy couldn’t fail to want her as his accomplished bride? She awaits in agonising suspension both in Persuasion the novel and this staged version. I almost feel sorry for her . She is totally unfulfilled.  We have the predatory Mrs Clay, named  Penelope in this play and the equally  predatory, nephew and cousin, Mr William Elliot. Kellynch Hall is rented to Admiral and Mrs Croft. Admiral and Mrs Croft are as loveable as they are in the novel and as clueless about who will marry whom. What transfers easily are the many misunderstandings of who is going to marry whom. Its almost like A Midsummers Night’s Dream in its mistaken who loves who scenarios. The Musgroves, Charles and Mary, Louisa and Henrietta are the upwardly mobile types and perhaps represent a 21st century married couple in embryo.  Mr and Mrs Musgrove, their older parents represent the past. The Musgroves as a whole family represent a changing society. Lady Russel, a family friend and near neighbour to Sir Walter is as likeable as she is in the novel. She is Annes true friend. She makes mistakes and get things wrong in her advice to Anne  but you always feel her heart is in the right place and she is willing to adapt her views.



The first scene is when Sir Walter decides to rent Kellynch Hall and go to live in Bath. Anne ,who really doesn’t like Bath delays the inevitable by going to stay with her sister Mary at Marys home three miles away at Uppercross. Things like dates and distances are highlighted in this production in a comical way,making fun of what was significant in the 18th century and really is not now.

Mary can’t cope with anything, her unruly children, her disaffected husband Charles and she generally sinks into a sort of hypochondria always feeling ill and suffering stress.  Only one of Marys children features in this production  . He is named ,Samuel, although the children in the novel are merely called, “the  children.” Samule has an accident and damages his collar bone. Anne is the only one able  to cope of course. Mary tries to escape the action whenever she can. So, all true to the novel so far. Certain things work in both centuries.

 We are informed that Captain Wentworth is of course the younger brother of Mrs Croft and is coming to live with them at Kellynch. The news makes Anne even more neurotic her emotions and thoughts  going into hyperdrive. I have always thought Captain Wentworth disappoints in the novel. He takes so long to realise he still loves Anne.  Anne for her part has never been able to get Captain Wentworth out of her mind. Although statements by Captain Wentworth such as ,”true love lasts forever,” in both the play and the novel suggest otherwise about him. He simply appears to not be self aware, while Anne agonises and interprets her thoughts and feelings and observations in both the novel and in the play ad finitum.


Anne observing Charles and Mary dancing at Uppercross. Charles compliments Anne on her playing the harpsichord. (I don't think so!)


There is plenty of music and suggestions of balls and dancing in the book. At Uppercross,Louisa and Harriet have impromptu balls. Often breaking into, dance. Anne of course does not like to dance in the novel and in this production too. Ann is known to play the harpsichord. During one music session at Uppercross the Musgroves home, Mr Musgrove  says. “Well played Anne,” after a piece of electronica drum and base played through speakers set around the stage. Of course Anne hasn’t played anything, she has  merely been standing,  a spectator. The audience have a little giggle. Charles Musgrove rather disturbingly performs a robotic dance.Think Ricky Gervais’s David Brent in the English version of The Office

The stage set is interesting. It consists of two enormous white oblong blocks laid one on top of the other like chunks of iceberg. The back drop is a shiny vertically corrugated vinyl blue curtain , representing the sea, an ever present reference in the play and the book.The great ice berg blocks shift and turn and slide over each other to represent changes of  location and mood. For the visit to Lyme the stage blocks shift and the top most block of ice  sticks out like a cantilever bridge towards the audience.

Now this is where the true Janeite might think things get really silly or even worse, wrong, in a very bad way.

 


Captain Wentworth doing some great dance moves with Louisa and Henrietta.

We get to Lyme. Bubbles pour down in a great bubble waterfall from the,” gods,” and party time begins. Captain Wentworth boogies in a rather disturbing energetic fashion to  Dua Lupa in nothing but a pair of tiny ,”budgy smugglers,” (see the end of this review for a definition). Louisa, scantily dressed in a shiny gold bikini  writhes to the music  getting up very close to Captain Wentworth. Captain Benwick is there looking disconsolate and trying to enjoy himself mooning over his dead finance Fanny Harville. I should mention, some characters from the novel do not appear in this stage adaptation. Captain and Mrs Harville do not. They are alluded to by mention of the dead Fanny Harville.   Mary Musgrove is still moaning about her children and her husband. She seems more stressed out mother now than a hypochondriac. Although she is an annoying character, she is the most modern of Austen’s creations in this novel. She is a mother, not a very good one , but she also wants to have a social life and is interested in things outside the confines of her home. Mary and her husband Charles  try to enjoy themselves, with difficulty and dance rather disturbingly. (Do not try any of these dances at home)Charles becomes a sweating gyrating mess.

   The scene set in  Lyme is reminiscent of the present day twenty four hour partying on Ibiza. Suddenly from nowhere strides a tall Adonis, in a pair of brief swimming trunks and magisterially and  manfully strides through the middle of the party from one side of the stage to the other and disappears. He gives a hard meaningful glare at Anne, who is to one side. Anne is dressed in jeans and striped shirt by the way, which she has been wearing. throughout the play and takes no part in the hedonism. She merely   observes the mayhem, looking somewhat stunned as indeed do most of the audience. This stranger is  Mr Elliot their cousin unknown to them at this moment, who is to inherit Kellynch Hall and the baronetcy. He is almost naked as he strides across the stage, causing a few embarrassed giggles  in the audience.. An  Adonis more like Fred Flintstone than Arnold Schwarzenegger.  

Songs by  Frank Ocean, Dua Lupa and Cardi B tracks provide the music. Some of the lyrics are ,"ripe," to say the least. I am tempted to quote some Cardi B lyrics here so you can imagine the scene but I will get banned forever from posting my reviews if I did. (Please see the link at the end of this review ).  Not for childrens ears or eyes. The tracks relate to modern relationships and describe the good and the bad and the very bad and relate to Jane Austen’s Persuasion in a surprising way. Who would have thought Cardi B and Jane Austen had anything in common? And as for the dancing, Louisa and Henrietta go crazy with some energetic robotic moves and exaggerated disco dancing throwing arms and legs around  in some sort of coordinated wild frenzy.


Louisa and Captain Wentworth get close.

Louisa has her accident sliding between Captain Wentworth’s legs attempting an energetic dance move set in this mass of bubbles. As she lays there unconscious, not seen by most of the audience, the bubbles totally cover her. Anne  stands over Louisa and squeezes tomato ketchup on to her prostrate body. It reprsents blood and gore, in case you were  wondering. Louisa is removed from the scene to a local hotel.

The Lyme scene is hedonistic and rather silly to be honest. There is no way Captain Wentworth can possibly recoup any respectability from this scene,  surely? He looks like an idiot , behaves like an idiot and to be honest, he is. They all, apart from Anne behave embarrassingly to put it mildly. 

There is a break in the proceedings at this point. The audience can go to the loo or maybe have a drink at the bar in the foyer. Marilyn and I sat there mesmerised at the sight of stage assistants frantically hoovering up the soap suds and wiping down the huge stage blocks. It took them forever and we both thought the final part of the play would never happen. The volume of soap suds to be cleared up was prodigious. I don’t know whether the shock value of what the audience had witnessed so far had disgruntled some but  two ladies sitting in front of us turned to Marilyn and myself and forcefully  complained that we had been playing music on our phones throughout and they were very accusatory. Marilyn calmly and firmly explained that the speakers surrounding the stage had been playing quiet background music  and it wasn’t us. They turned around again in a huff.Perhaps their hearing aids were not adjusted correctly. Unfortunately, soon after, my phone. which I thought I had switched off, rang loudly. Alice our eldest daughter tried to call me. I had to turn it off swiftly and I must have been red with embarrassment but hidden by the dim lighting of the auditorium.  The two ladies in front didn’t turn a hair.

Throughout the performance there is a running gag about the year 1806 and said as “18 -  0 – 6.”  In a somewhat Monty Pythonish way.  A reference to events eight years earlier of course. The other running gag is Sir walter Elliots catch phrase ,”you must be using Gowlands on your face.” Those who have read the novel will know. However I have done a google  search. Gowlands has other connotations which I won’t divulge now.


Biographies of the cast. You will see some actors have more than one part.

The stages tectonic plates shift once more and the stage now becomes Bath.

Lady Russel arrives with Anne. Sir Walter, Elizabeth and Penelope (Mrs Clay), are already settled in Bath. There is a scene where Penelope appears to be in charge organising where everybody is to stay. It is suggested Mary and Charles Musgrove are to stay too. Elizabeth wonders where everybody will sleep. Penelope has  been waiting for the moment. She suggests, surreptitiously to Elizabeth, that to provide room she can sleep in Elizabeth’s bed with her and  kisses her suggestively. Elizabeth is confused but rejects the idea. In the novel I had wondered about Mrs Clays seemingly clinging relationship with Elizabeth. One interpretation is made evident here. Mr Elliot is in Bath and makes his presence known to the Elliots often visiting them. When he realises the girl he noticed at Lyme is his cousin Anne his interest is peaked even more. Elizabeth of course thinks his interest is in her.There is something cold and calculated about Mr Elliot. He has plans.

The major scene in Bath for this adaptation is Lady Dalrymples party. The denouement is set. Now I must prepare you for this. There is no Mrs Smith in this adaptation. So we wonder how Anne is to know the full extent of Mr Elliot’s machinations, but be patient gentle readers. We shall see. All comes to light. If the Ibizan party time at Lyme might shock, Lady Dalrymple’s party will stun you completely. 

Lights, music, loud electronica and hard driving drum and base ensues. Wild dancing. Louisa and Henrietta  strut their stuff. Mr Elliot has totally commandeered Anne by now. He has designs on marrying her. Lady Russel, Sir Walter, Elizabeth, Penelope, everybody think so. They are  convinced a wedding is imminent. Just when we are settling into to a wild party and getting used to that, Ibizan, Lyme style,hedonism the whole thing moves up a few notches. Lady Dalrymple, a double take and yes it must be Lady Dalrymple, strides onto the stage. An enormous hunky figure at least 6 foot 6 inches tall, dressed head to foot,  in a glistening sequined  black rubber ,”gimp,” costume and wearing skyscraper tall  high heels . She/ he, moves provocatively in a lewd way. The audience gasped then some giggles. I don’t think anybody knew where to look.  Oh my God Lady Dalrymple is a dominatrix. Perhaps she is too in the novel? I hadn’t thought of that, but now come to think about it. 

Captain Wentworth appears at the party and Anne and he talk. Mr Elliot comes over and forcefully, and with a dominant and even an abusive controlling manner  demands she comes away from Wentworth. Anne stands her ground and refuses him. If she didn’t know his true character before she does now. She turns him away and  refuses his marriage proposal.  Mr Elliot , always cold and calculated, we see it now so obviously, immediately finds Elizabeth and proposes to her instead. Elizabeth, who is aware of all that has gone before,  accepts his proposal. She is shameless and has no dignity. They are two people  not destined for love but to eternally torment each other. There's will be a marriage based on a desire for  wealth and position only. Elizabeth has never had the self-awareness and self-analysis of Anne. She only lives for societies rules. As she spurned Penelope’s advances she once more  denies her true self. A moment of sadness that the audience is very aware of.


Anne and Captain Wentworth at last....maybe.

Of course it wouldn’t be Jane Austen’s Persuasion without, "the letter. "We don’t see Captain Wentworth write the letter in this production. It is delivered to Anne during the ball / bacchanalia at Lady Dalrymples by the young boy who was Samuel Musgrove and  now plays the part of a pageboy.

The letter is as it should be.

“I can listen no longer in silence. I must speak to you by such means as are within my reach. You pierce my soul. I am half agony, half hope…”

 The play ends with Captain Wentworth and Anne professing their love face to face, a love that of course has never faded since finding love eight years previously. At long last Anne Elliot finally makes a decision for herself. Lady Russel is persuaded. Sir Walter Elliot is persuaded. So we think, this is the happy ending of the novel. But,  this is a hybrid of two differing centuries. A weird and wonderful world.  

THE LAST PAGE OF THE PLAY SCRIPT SAYS

( I suppose this is the happy ending people talk about)

WENTWORTH. I’m happy now

ANNE. So am I

WENTWORTH And is It a beginning not an ending

ANNE I hope so. We haven’t even lived half our lives.

WENTWORTH How do you know there could be another war.

ANNE You could be dead by the end of the Summer.

WENTWORTH Or I could die in bed fifty years from now, holding your hand.

ANNE Holding my hand? Am I dead or alive at this point?

WENTWORTH It’s impossible to know what will happen.

ANNE To either of us.

WENTWORTH That’s the fun of it.

ANNE Whatever’s going to happen to me. I’d like to be with you while it happens.

WENTWORTH So we just take the risk?

ANNE Life has some risks.

WENTWORTH Love is one.

ANNE You’ve been lucky before.

WENTWORTH I hope I’ll be lucky again.

ANNE Good luck Captain Wentworth

WENTWORTH Good luck Anne Elliot.

THE END

 

So do you think they get married or not?

 

 

Reference:

Persuasion By Jane Austen (Adapted by Jeff Daniels with James Yeatman) Published by Samuel French at Concord Theatricals 2017 revised edition 2022

 

The Rose Theatre Kingston upon Thames:  https://rosetheatre.org/

Gimp suit: a bondage costume.

Cardi B song lyric:  ( an example)

https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/cardi-b/trustissues.html

 

Definition of “Budgie smugglers.”:

a man’s small skin tight swimming trunks that reveal the outline of his penis and testicles. Usually not a pleasant sight. A budgie, being a small compact bird, is the shape of what is seen through the bathing trunks. Hence the phrase.

GOWLANDS:  

https://pemberley.com/?kbe_knowledgebase=gowlands-lotion-syphilis

Thursday, 17 February 2022

REGENTS CANAL WALK (Little Venice to Kings Cross)

 A sketch map of The Regents Canal showing where it joins The Grand Union Canal at Little Venice and its start at Limehouse on the Thames.


Wednesday 9th February, John Lodge and myself met at Waterloo Station at just a little after 10am. We planned to walk along The Regents Canal, that wends its way from its junction with the Grand Union Canal near the canal basin at ,”Little Venice,” and curves round past Regents Park to Limehouse Basin where the canal meets the River Thames. The walk  takes in the Georgian architecture of the Regency, a terrifying Victorian disaster, grand converted industrial buildings, modernist steal industrial units, the shops, pubs and cafes of vibrant Camden, the homes of twentieth century writers and actors, the centre for British folk music, the home of a great war time hero, the grand homes of diplomats and oligarchs, institutes at the forefront of medical research, canal boats clustered together creating cosy communities and on the final part of this first stretch of our walk the grand architecture of St Pancras Station and the new modernist British Library.



The canal was first proposed by Thomas Homer in 1802 as a link from the Paddington arm of the then Grand Junction Canal (opened in 1801) with the River Thames at Limehouse. The Regent's Canal was built during the early 19th century after an Act of Parliament was passed in 1812. John Nash was a director of the company; in 1811. He produced a masterplan for The Prince Regent to redevelop a large area of central north London. As a result, the Regent's Canal was included in the scheme, running for part of its distance along the northern edge of Regents Park. The intention was to create a canal that joined The Grand Union Canal leading up to Birmingham, the Midlands and the north with the Thames and the port of London and the trade that came to London from the rest of the world




John at Warwick Avenue tube entrance.

John and I emerged from Warwick Road tube entrance and walked on to the road bridge that crosses the canal at the point where the Little Venice basin is located and Regents Canal begins.On one side of the road we looked down onto the canal basin where it expands into a large area of water with canal boats moored to its quays at various points. We started our walk on the south side of the road bridge and aimed east towards Regents Park and Camden, along Maida Road. It is edged by large Georgian and early Victorian houses. A blue plaque on one house informed us the John Masefield ( 1878-1967) the poet laureate, lived in this house from 1907 to 1912. He is remembered as the author of the classic children's novels The Midnight Folk and The Box of Delights, and poems, including The Everlasting Mercy and Sea-Fever.






John Masefield's house.



SEA FEVER by John Masefield

I must go down to the seas again, to the lonely sea and the sky,
And all I ask is a tall ship and a star to steer her by,
And the wheel's kick and the wind's song and the white sail's shaking,
And a gray mist on the sea's face, and a gray dawn breaking.

I must go down to the seas again, for the call of the running tide
Is a wild call and a clear call that may not be denied;
And all I ask is a windy day with the white clouds flying,
And the flung spray and the blown spume, and the sea-gulls crying.

I must go down to the seas again, to the vagrant gypsy life,
To the gull's way and the whale's way, where the wind's like a whetted knife;
And all I ask is a merry yarn from a laughing fellow-rover,
And quiet sleep and a sweet dream when the long trick's over.

Just opposite his front door there were only the sight of narrow boats to sooth his sea yearning spirit. None of your,” flung spray and the blown spume.”




The canal opposite John Masefield's house.



A shiny Maserati sports car was parked at the side of the road in front of John Masefield’s previous residence. The driver’s side door was wide open and the driver sat making a call on his mobile. Red leather upholstered car seats and it had a dashboard reminiscent of a fighter jet control display. The car, the driver and the area exuded wealth.

Nearby John Masefield’s house stands a vast cavernous brick built church in the Victorian Gothic style. The Church notice board informed us it was the ,”Catholic Apostolic Church, Maida Avenue W2.”The gates and doors had hefty padlocks on them. We saw that the plants and shrubs surrounding the church were well kept, so the church was not abandoned. Catholic churches are not usually described as Apostolic and they also usually are named after a saint. Both John and I felt it wasn’t a usual catholic church. I researched it and discovered a reference in the Britannica. The Catholic Apostolic Church, was formed in 1832 largely by the Scotsman Edward Irving. He and his followers prepared for the second coming. Apocalyptic groups also formed in the United States. The apocalyptic prophecies of William Miller (1782–1849) in the 1840s led to the formation of the church The Roman Catholic Church calls itself the one apostolic church but this form of Catholicism is different in many ways. Much is similar to and could be mistaken for Roman Catholicism but there are doctrinal differences for instance there is a great stress on symbolism, and in the Eucharist, it rejects both transubstantiation and consubstantiation but holds strongly to a presence. In some ways these philosophical positions appear to have subtle differences but in theological terms they are very different.




The Catholic Apostolic Church on Maida Avenue.



Most of the canal boats we saw on our walk were privately owned. Many of the narrow boats were personalised and adapted to the owner’s needs. Plant pots, washing lines and smoke stacks protruding from roofs. All were painted in bright reds and greens with intricate folk art flower designs adorning them. One boat had the title, THE ARTIST painted in large letters along the side of its hull. John and I surmised that an artist lived here. Narrow boat life is definitely for the free spirited and the adventurous. The living space is small and clearly narrow. One stretch of the canal, before we reached Camden, had a cluster of boats. Tall wrought iron gates blocked a stretch of the canal footpath on the north side of the canal where these boats were moored.. Wooden sheds and planted areas of the embankment, flowers, shrubs and vegetable patches with bicycles chained to railings depicted what appeared to be a permanent community of boats. A water born village.




A community of canal boats.



We wandered from the canal when places we saw on the map took our interest. We saw that the Cecil Sharp House is located a couple of roads from the side of the canal. It is the centre for ,”The English Folk Dance and Song Society. "We went inside and a young lady at the reception desk said we could look around. It has a vast hall for folk music and dance performances. It has a mural along the length of one wall by Ivon Hitchins and is a modernist depiction of key English folk dances and traditions. It hangs above performance that takes place in the hall. The centre also has a small library packed with many books and manuscripts. The genial librarian told us that they had books that even the British Library didn’t have. The library is named The Vaughn Williams Memorial Library. It holds many of Vaughn Williams’s manuscripts. He was a classical composer who collected folk songs and he included folk music into many of his compositions.




Cecil Sharp House.



It always a surprise to come across the houses where people, who are part of British history and culture, once lived. Does where somebody lives tell us about the person? I wonder. We were walking on the south side of the canal and I noticed a blue plaque on a house on the opposite side. We came to a small bridge and crossed to have a look. The blue plaque read, Guy Gibson VC 1918-1944. Piolet. Leader of The Dambusters Raid lived here. You can work it out. He was 26years old when he died. The raid on the German dams occurred in May 1943. My dad would have been excited to see this house. He was in the RAF during the war and served as an armourer on one of the Battle of Britain airfields at Bicester. Guy Gibson lead one of the most daring raids of WWII destroying the Ruhr Dams which flooded and damaged a large proportion of the German industrial capability. The factories were back running within months but the raids hampered the Nazi war effort for a period of time. This white Victorian house in a row of white Victorian houses was the home of a real national hero.




Guy Gibson's home next to the canal.



Further along the canal on the south side we came across another blue plaque, that of the actor Arthur Lowe. Captain Mainwaring of the Home Guard no less who was one of the stars of Dads Army. A fictional war hero who indeed represented the heroes of the Home Guard.




The home of Arthur Lowe in Maida Vale.



As we walked along the canal we  saw the Regents Park Mosque ahead so we took another detour to visit it. A school party from a local school were being taken in when we arrived. John and I walked around the precinct and stood at the entrance to the great prayer hall. We could have gone inside the hall but we wanted to continue our walk. Preparations such as removing our shoes and mentally getting ready to pray would have been fine for the two of us but we had to move on. Nobody challenged us within the Mosque precincts to ask what we wanted. We sensed a lot of trust. The few people we came across were at prayer.




Regents Park Mosque.



The canal passes to the south of Primrose Hill which is located north of the canal on the opposite side to London Zoo. The area around Primrose Hill is a famous area for writers, actors and musicians who live in the old Georgian and Victorian houses lining the local streets. I have been reading some of Alan Bennett’s diaries, 2005 to 2015. He is a prolific diarist, playwright, screen writer, actor and novelist. He is also famous for his early satirical stage shows with Peter Cook and Dudley More appearing at the Edinburgh fringe festival. Alan Bennett’s talents are prodigious. Some of his plays include the ,”History Boys,” that launched the careers of some very famous actors and was made into a film. He wrote ,”The Lady in the Van,” about a Miss Shepherd who lived in a van for a number of years in the small driveway in front of his house. It too has been filmed with with Maggie Smith playing the part of Miss Shepherd. I had looked up Alan Bennet’s house on the internet which he has now moved from and discovered its address, 23 Gloucester Crescent. The internet even provides pictures of it. Looking at Google maps on my phone John and I could see that Gloucester Crescent was nearby. We found it and halfway round the crescent we discovered Alan Bennetts famous house with large gates in front of the short driveway. It was behind these gates where Miss Shepherd must have lived in her van.


 
Alan Bennett used to live at 23 Gloucester Crescent. "The Lady in the Van, "was parked just behind the gates.





Nearby is Camden High Street. We decided to stop and have a pub lunch. There are a few venues to choose from in Camden High Street. We went into The Bucks Head. We sat and ate some delicious fish and chips and drank two pints of Camden Pale ale each. It is brewed locally in Camden . It has a hoppy taste and has a great flavour. I recommend the Camden brew. Many of the shops in Camden are small businesses that sell local clothes designers clothing, shoe makers and artists display and sell their wares too.. It is a young area and innovative crafts are evident in the high street. As we walked along,we noticed people dressed and adorned in avant garde ways. Many appear to not only be experimenting with what they wear but also what they do with their bodies. Some of the pubs are live music venues like the Bucks Head where John and I had our pub lunch and young musicians thrive in the area. Camden High Street leads up to the iconic railway bridge and the canal locks where we re-joined the canal footpath.



Camden Lock.




One old bridge we walked under beside the canal had three archways constructed from massive black ionic columns made of cast iron. The bridge itself had some intricate iron work topping the walls across its width. Homeless sleepers had left some of their belongings on the banks on both sides under the bridge arches. Two gentlemen lay in their sleeping bags as we passed talking and discussing things. They ignored us. A plaque placed on the embankment related the history of this bridge.

“Blow Up Bridge,” At 3am on the 2nd October 1874 the boat Tilbury carrying gunpowder to a quarry in the Midlands exploded demolishing the bridge and killing three people. Locals sprang from their beds feeling an earthquake.When the bridge was rebuilt the pillars were turned around so that they offered a smooth surface for the boats towing ropes. Look out for the rope grooves on either sides of the pillars.”

It is mind blowing, no pun intended. Further reading reveals that the boat was carrying petroleum and nuts as well as the gunpowder. A combustable combination. The consequences  of this accident brought about, by way of an act of Parliament, a change in the laws concerning transporting gunpowder and petroleum.




"Blow Up Bridge."



While walking past Regents Park, along the side of the canal, we came across a row of six , what appeared to be, large Georgian mansions. I discovered they were designed by Quinlan Terry who was commissioned by the government to design buildings to complete Nash’s vision for Regents Park. They were actually, unbelievably, completed in 2002. The American Ambassador lives in one of them. They each have a name. They are called, Veneto Villa, Doric Villa, Corinthian Villa, Ionic Villa, Gothick Villa and the Regency Villa.




"Regency Villa," on Regents Park outer circle designed by Quinlan Terry, completed in 2002.



As we walked towards St Pancras Station we saw a small park to one side with a stone church in the centre and few gravestones dotted about. I was for continuing on towards St Pancras but John suggested we go and have a look at the church. We soon discovered what we had come across. The first grave stone we stopped to look at had carved into it, “Mary Wollstonecraft Godwin. Author of The Vindication of the rights of Women.”




Mary Wollstonecraft's tomb in St Pancras Old Church cemetery.



Where were we? It was St Pancras Old Church. When the railways came in the 1860’s when St Pancras Station was being constructed, the churchyard of St Pancras Old Church was in the way. Architects were employed to remove and reposition many of the gravestones. The church was not affected and neither was the tomb of Mary Wollstonecraft. We came to a tree that had many gravestones piled against it. Over the years the roots of the tree have entangled the grave stones and included them into its root system. A plaque near the tree read , “ The Hardy Tree.” So we read on. As a young man Thomas Hardy was an architect working for Arthur Bromfield. He was employed to work on the graveyard here. He spent many hours in St Pancras churchyard removing and repositioning gravestones. It was Hardy who created this cluster of gravestones around the tree. A day of amazing discoveries.



The Hardy Tree in the cemetery of St Pancras Old Church. Thomas Hardy created this pile of gravestones.



We walked on towards St Pancras and Kings Cross. We came across the Crick Institute for research into cancers. It is a vast modernist building with a massive glass roof that is reminiscent of an armadillo shell. John and I went inside to see a free exhibition they have in the entrance. Video interviews with scientists and surgeons are part of the exhibition. Its good to know about cancers, if somewhat sobering and thought provoking. As we get old all of us are susceptible to some sort of cancer. But what the Crick institute is doing is absolutely amazing. Their research is saving the world. They give us all hope.

After this the British Library was our next call. We went upstairs to the café and had a coffee. We visited the free exhibition they have there. The exhibition displays many documents and books that are so important to British people and the United Kingdom. There is a copy of the Magna Carta, a first folio edition of Shakespeare's collected works published by two of Shakespeare's friends , John Heminge and Henry Condell, who edited it and supervised the printing. They appear in a list of the 'Principall Actors' who performed in Shakespeare's plays, alongside Richard Burbage, Thomas Kemp and Shakespeare himself.



Shakespeare's Complete Works a first folio.




There are illuminated manuscripts of the Bible . We came across a poem written in perfect cursive style by Jane Austen to her brother Frank. It lies on the wooden writing slope her father bought her.



Jane Austen's handwritten poem to her brother Frank lying on the writing slope her father gave her.



Because it is the 100 th anniversary of Ullysses, by James Joyce published by ,”Shakespeare and Company,” in 1922 there was a first edition on display and a letter from Virginia Wolf and another from Sylvia Beach of Shakepeare and Co. Virginia Wolf politely turned down the offer of publishing the book at her Hogarth press in Richmond. In the display there was a large A1 sized piece of paper where Joyce had planned out one part of his book. It consisted of lists, phrases and words written in blue and red colouring pencil much of which is crossed out showing Joyce included that particular crossed out thought or idea in the novel. A large series of concentric almond shaped ovals nested inside each other, were drawn on part of the paper. Each oval had ideas written within it. A design that can be interpreted in a number of ways. The whole display was fascinating. There was analysis of the structure and themes in the book. I have read Ulysses in its entirety. It was similar to the effort needed to running a marathon. Exhaustion and tiredness could set in. I loved the language and the rhythms of the text, the lilting Irish cadences, phraseology and words.The language entices and seduces you. Much of the dialogue and description is enigmatic. Punctuation isn’t of great concern. Words and phrases tumble together. A great, attractive modernist piece of writing. It still confuses me but It’s good to know, as shown in this exhibition, that Joyce had a structural and thematic concept for it. Near the Ulysses exhibition there was also an extensive display about Angela Carter that I didn’t spend enough time with.

So John and I left the British Library, its massive iron statue of Isaac Newton hunched forward focussed on using a pair of compasses based on William Blake’s drawing of Newton. After having explored so many things along the way John and I walked past the front of St Pancras Station’s immense Victorian gothic masterpiece and got the tube from Kings Cross back to Waterloo. From Waterloo, platform one, we got our train back home. The next stage from Kings Cross to Lime House is an adventure for next time.











https://www.themodernhouse.com/journal/walking-tour-of-regents-canal/

https://www.visitlondon.com/things-to-do/london-areas/regents-canal

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regent%27s_Canal

http://www.friendsofregentscanal.org/features/tourism/CIC/Aug-2013/history-panels/image-catalogue.html

https://londonist.com/london/great-outdoors/the-regent-s-canal-the-bi-centenary-of-london-s-most-famous-man-made-waterway



Arthur Lowe : http://www.screenonline.org.uk/people/id/523136/index.html

Guy Gibson : http://www.helstonhistory.co.uk/local-people/wg-cdr-guy-gibson-raf-vc/

https://stpancrasoldchurch.posp.co.uk/

https://www.crick.ac.uk/

https://www.poetry foundations .org/poets/john-masefield































Tuesday, 25 January 2022

IS OUR GOVERNMENT TRYING TO DESTROY THE BBC ( British Broadcasting Corporation) ?

 


BRITISH BROADCASTING HOUSE north of Oxford Circus. 

Nadine Dorries, the culture secretary, in the midst of the Downing Street woes over a party culture in a time of lockdown and CORONA virus restrictions and rules has found a way, she thinks and it also appears to the rest of the population of Great Britain,  of distracting the British public from the infantile, self centred  obfuscating  behaviour of Boris Johnson. Who does she think she is kidding? Do anything to save the idiot, seems to be her approach and what will stir everybody up like a hornets nest, attack the BBC. So she has got her teeth into something she hates. It’s obvious.

 

The Guardian 17.1.2022 Jim Waterson, the Guardian’s media editor writes

 The culture secretary, Nadine Dorries, has confirmed that the BBC’s funding will be frozen for the next two years – but has softened her stance on the permanent abolition of the television licence fee.

The annual levy on television usage will remain at £159 until April 2024, requiring cuts to the BBC’s output. However, it will then rise in line with inflation for the next four years – a better deal than had been proposed in some press briefings from the government.

Dorries also watered down her own suggestion that the licence fee would be abolished from 2028 onwards, raising suspicions that the focus of her provocative intervention on Sunday was to distract from Boris Johnson’s woes.”

 On Sunday she was virtually announcing the demise of the BBC in a leaked statement, very undemocratic, but by Monday, to Parliament, she was back tracking. Probably members of her own party had a word and explained you can’t just resign something as important to our culture and  the British public as the BBC  to history , just like that, in some petulant rant. Things seem to have been watered down but the danger to the .”Beeb,” is still there. Surely the British public should be allowed to have their say as a minimum requirement. It’s not like getting rid of your garden waste at the local dump.

The BBC has been with us for a century. This year is the BBC’s centenary. It officially began 1922 although its roots go back to 1920. It is a cultural icon not only for us Brits but also for the rest of the world by way of The World Service. It has brought open mindedness, the facts, clear sighted analysis of events, debate about all the important questions relating to us as human beings, politics, religion, art, music, history, drama, science, entertainment and education. Just looking at todays agenda on The World Service, Iran’s negotiations in Vienna are being discussed. Mexico, Afghanistan, Italy, Buddhism and a coup in Burkina Faso are just some of the topics covered. These programmes are broadcast to the people of these countries and in many cases provide the only news outlet and balanced analysis of what is going on. Often the BBC provides another side to what is going on in these countries.

One vital aspect of the BBC that has been so important during the COVID pandemic, is that the BBC has provided  educational output for schools and families. It has provided parents ,teachers and children with the most amazing resources. Parents have been forced to try their best to educate their children at home and the BBC has been there to support and lead.  It is explorative, questioning and provides high quality teaching. No educationalist , parent or pupil would argue that learning online and at home  is the best situation for children to learn full time. Learning online has shown its benefits though and that it can be a useful aspect of learning and teaching. But face to face teaching with friends and fellow pupils in a school environment will always be vital for immediate teacher feedback and relationshisp and team building. The BBC has got as close as it can to providing good education and done the best anybody could expect in the circumstances.

People like Nadine Dorries can argue that the BBC format is outdated. Nowadays we communicate and get our televisual experiences in so many new ways enabled by technology. However, SKY, NETFLIX, AMAZON, DISNEY , three of the biggest providers of entertainment and information online, are companies with investors and their  paramount purpose are profits. What their political, religious and societal beliefs are , who knows? Whoever pays them. They pander to the  audiences they attract. We read so many reports about misogyny and racism and political and religious bias inherent in their structures and algorithms. The BBC is quite able to and is adapting to the new ways of communication. There really is no argument against it from that quarter.

The BBC is truly the nearest any body can get to fairmindedness and openness.  In theory it does not have any influences making it do one thing or another.  The Conservative party accuse it of being left wing liberal. But it is not. Jeremy Corbyn, especially when he was the leader of the Labour Party, came under the scrutiny of the BBC. Because it criticises and praises everybody when the situation requires, it  will always be open to criticism. If the BBC says something against or questions strongly  what you as an organisation think and are trying to do then of course you are going to think of it as biased.

The spurious argument that people can’t afford the licence fee of £159 a year is a red herring. Some will obviously find the fee too much for their finances. These people should be provided for by the government. That licence fee of £159 per annum, in one context sounds a lot but it isn’t. NETFLIX subscriptions cost anything from £25 per month to £45 per month depending on the package you pay for. The cheapest of those costs £300 per year the most expensive, £ 540 per year. How are poor people going to finance that if it is deemed that the £159 is too much? Certainly not from the government. The licence fee pales into insignificance. What cost freedom of speech and truth being told to power? Do we want to destroy this democratic, fair minded,  educational institution over spurious arguments. Nadine Dorries might not like the BBC and I am sure many others don’t for different reasons. Do we want one hater to destroy this immensely valuable cultural organisation?

 The BBC’s charter is renewed every few years. Not if Nadine Dorries gets her way though.  Its premise and ethos originally looked very much like that of  the  British upper classes. It reflected the status quo of  1922.  Our society and the world has changed and developed unrecognisably since then and so has the BBC. However, its central ethos, that it is required to be fair and honest, that central moral principle, has not changed. In 1922 it was trying to be fair and honest too.  As society and the world changes obviously some changes in its royal charter are necessary to fit the times we live in.  

This present charter was presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport by Command of Her Majesty in December 2016 and sets out the key purposes of the BBC. The charter begins with this statement.

 

“The BBC’s Mission The Mission of the BBC is to act in the public interest, serving all audiences through the provision of impartial, high-quality and distinctive output and services which inform, educate and entertain.  The Public Purposes of the BBC are as follows.

I have taken the five key points from the charter that explain what the BBC is for in more detail.

The first point,

“To provide impartial news and information to help people understand and engage with the world around them:”

Everyday of every week and every year the BBC provides this impartial news through reporting but also discussion and analysis. The daily TV and radio news programmes provide the on going evolving news. Programmes such as Question Time, debate current issues involving people from all sides of the argument. They discuss questions provided by ordinary people about issues in the news. Panorama, investigates and discusses single important issues, for instance, education, poverty, housing, whatever it might be. The early morning Radio 4 programme team question vigorously and energetically government ministers, heads of business, scientists and those at the heart of current issues. They are made to explain themselves and their actions. Programmes discussing more esoteric topics such as religion , philosophy or morality might be debated in programmes such as The Moral Maze.

 

Secondly:

“To support learning for people of all ages:”

During the lock downs and the closures of schools the BBC has provided vitally important lessons for all school years. They have been providing online material for teachers for many years but during this pandemic they have really stepped up.No other organisation could have done that. The BBC ‘s independence allows it to do this. When the OPEN university began  the BBC provided lectures and lessons to support Open University degrees. When eventually schools become, Open Schools, the BBC will be needed to to support everday schooling. The work done during lockdown can only be built on. Of course families living in poverty will need to be supported. Some of the funding that goes into educating every child in this country can be used to support this change without much extra money being required. The BBC also supports all our learning and teaches every individual in this country through programming about wildlife, history, science, geography, technology, art, music, drama and literature. No other organisation could dedicate itself to doing this.

Thirdly:

“To show the most creative, highest quality and distinctive output and services.”

This refers to art, music, literature and drama. The BBC because it is funded by the taxpayer and not some for profit organisation with share holders and people with their own political agenda, they can take risks. It can afford to try things which might fail. Some of the most creative and adventurous television has come from the BBC because of this ability. Much of what the BBC produces wins awards around the world. It is not only a cultural icon for Britain but drama and documentaries relevant to many cultures and other countries has enriched the world as a whole.

Fourthly:

“To reflect, represent and serve the diverse communities of all of the United Kingdom’s nations and regions and, in doing so, support the creative economy across the United Kingdom.”

Every region of the United Kingdom has its own regional BBC radio station. They also have  regional television stations too., BBC South. BBC London and so on. The national and global output of the BBC is also available to all of the UK as well. It gives voice to diverse groups within the UK. It encourages and develops new initiatives within the regions highlighting art, businesses, music and technologies within those regions.

Fifthly:

“To reflect the United Kingdom, its culture and values to the world:”

I mentioned above the WORLD SERVICE and how that helps educate and inform the rest of the world. It might be relevant to ask, is that a good thing? Isn’t the British Government, through The World Service, promoting propaganda to the people of various countries? Part of the statement in the charter states that the BBC must promote ,” values of accuracy, impartiality, and fairness.”

Of course this can be argued about. What does it mean? How can we actually tell if this is what the BBC is actually doing and not just propagandising? We do get feedback from the people of  those countries. I know Americans tell me they would rather listen to the BBC news than their own news outputs. Friends in South America laud the importance of the BBC. I can site other examples of what people tell me. I know this is a very small straw poll but it does give an impression of how the BBC is thought of and valued round the world. We of course can make our further judgements based on what we see and hear from other news outlets and of course from what we read. The more we search and listen and look the more our own assessment is informed.

 

“The BBC is to act in the public interest, serving all audiences through the provision of impartial, high-quality and distinctive output and services which inform, educate and entertain.”

How many organisations can say that?

Controlling or even abolishing the BBC is an act of cultural vandalism by those who want to escape questioning or rather the questions they don’t want to hear. Schools, and the curriculum, Universities, museums, public demonstrations, immigrants, are all in the sights of this government.  Oliver Dowden a previous culture minister and now Nadine Dorries  are waging a war on our culture from free speech to historical interpretation.

Late  last night I listened to a radio 4 programme called The Moral Maze. Philosophers  were discussing the morality of our Prime Minister and the moral judgements of our government in the wake of ,”partygate,” the perceived breaking of lock down rules during this COVID pandemic. Rules they made themselves and the population as a whole has had to follow to , often, peoples pain and personal anguish. Only the BBC would or could hold a discussion like that broadcast to the nation. They explained a murky situation to say the least. Our Prime Minister is acting immorally was the bottom line. Listening made the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. What backlash would the BBC receive? Or was it so late at night and on Radio 4 and that probably very few people would actually be listening, the government might not notice? Still, the programme is out there. This is what the government wants to stop, free and open debate. The BBC is still providing it.One previous Conservative Minister, being interviewed on the programme, stridently put the point that it didn’t matter that Boris broke the rules his own rules over COVID restrictions. It didn’t matter to her these small transgressions of the government. What mattered to her  are the policies they are trying to implement. The panel actually laughed at her stridency and then pointed out the immorality of her standpoint. I remember discussing the morality of ,”does the end justify the means,” as a school boy. They dismissed her off hand. These are very strange times indeed.

As well as getting rid of the BBC , which appears to be a veiled way of controlling the cultural narrative, a new policy statement for culture has been produced by the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities.   It denies systemic racism exists and argues against what many minorities and liberal minded people see as the faults and problems in our society. The government wants to control the narrative about our country and our culture. There is a battle over Black Lives Matter, and whether statues should be removed or not. The government wants to control how we understand and explain these things. It does not want open debate and free questioning to take place.  The National Trust, is another body under scrutiny by our right wing government. The National Trust wants to interpret its houses and properties form the stand point of our colonial past. Why shouldn’t we know that the immense wealth that was made to build these amazing houses and estates came from slavery? Slavery is an important strand of our nation and its wealth, power and influence. An understanding of its role should have a more prominent part in our overall understanding of our history. It hasn’t been highlighted much  in the past. These opposing views to the governments narrative is out there being discussed and supported by many minority groups and political organisations. This government cannot turn the clock back and they cannot control the narrative now. Too many people and society as a whole, can see the evidence for themselves. There seems to be a cultural battle taking place on many fronts which the government will lose. They cannot eradicate the arguments and the narrative they don’t like.

 So the BBC is under attack. If this government destroys the BBC they will be destroying our society and our freedom of speech and intrinsically our democracy.

References:

The BBC Royal Charter: http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets/files/pdf/about/how_we_govern/2016/charter.pdf

Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities: The Report March 2021

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-report-of-the-commission-on-race-and-ethnic-disparities


The BBC: A People’s History by David Hendy review – inside the nation’s ‘moral improver’ | History books | The Guardian

There’s too much at stake to risk losing the BBC | Letters | The Guardian

Boris Johnson accused of targeting BBC to save his premiership | Politics | The Guardian

https://www.ft.com/content/3f499042-64c5-40d1-8d83-7d8ca0d817d9